Welcome 'home,' Sen. Roberts

This one cracks me up.

U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., might have trouble in the upcoming Kansas Republican primary because of a residency question.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/211334-roberts-facing-new-residency-questions

It got a little worse for Roberts when he said something careless about whether he’s really a Kansas resident.

He was asked about the residency controversy by a radio host. Roberts answered: “Every time I get an opponent – I mean, every time I get a chance, I’m home. I don’t measure my, what, my record with regards as a senator as how many times I sleep wherever it is,” he said.

Questions have arisen about whether Roberts actually lives in Kansas. It’s been reported that he only rents an apartment in his “home state,” and that the apartment is a gift from campaign donors.

The issue has dogged the veteran Republican lawmaker for years.

Radiologist Milton Wolf is challenging Roberts in the GOP primary. He jumped all over the gaffe when he said that Roberts hasn’t lived in Kansas for a long time. He’s out of touch with his constituents, he’s part of the D.C. establishment … etc.

Didn’t Dorothy tell Toto when they landed in Oz that “We’re not in Kansas anymore”?

Which is it, Sen. Roberts? Kansas or Oz?

Give it up, Mr. McDaniel; you lost

What in the world is Chris McDaniel trying to prove?

The defeated candidate for the U.S. Senate in Mississippi is turning out to be the world champion sore loser.

He lost the Republican runoff to six-term U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran. Yes, every political “expert” in Mississippi and around the country thought McDaniel would win. He didn’t.

Why? Because thousands of African-American Democrats crossed over to vote for Cochran and deny McDaniel the GOP nomination.

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/todd–mcdaniel-has-to-say-enough-is-enough-295691331679

McDaniel is crying “foul!” because Cochran employed a fairly uncommon strategy to collect more votes than his opponent.

He should give up the fight, call it quits, offer his support to his fellow Republican and go back to whatever he was doing before he became an almost-Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate.

McDaniel, though, isn’t likely to take this advice. He fancies himself as one of the nation’s many tea party golden boys and, by golly, he thinks he’s going to browbeat the Mississippi judicial system into ruling that Cochran’s vote total was illegitimate.

Sorry, Chris. You lost. Get over it.

Remembering a great American

This blog post is adapted from a column published July 5, 1998 in the Amarillo Globe-News.

“You know your grandmother died on the Fourth of July just to make sure we would remember her.”

So said my wife on July 4, 1978, the date of my grandmother’s death. She was right. I do remember that date. All of us in our family remember it.

And oh, do I remember this remarkable woman. My grandmother was an immigrant, but was as much of an American as any native-born U.S. citizen I’ve ever known. Her life, as well as that of her beloved husband, is a testament to the American Dream, the one in which people attain freedom and relative prosperity in a land they embraced as their own.

My grandmother’s life provides a cautionary tale to those who think we have too many “foreigners” living here, who forget this land was built by people just like my grandmother. Her life, while it didn’t produce great material wealth for her or her family, did produce a family whose members have fought for their country, who have lived honorably and prospered in the face of hardship, heartache and tragedy.

A slice of my grandmother’s story is worth sharing on the Fourth of July.

Her name was Diamondoula Panisoy Filipu. We called her “Yiayia,” which is Greek for “grandmother.” This endearment did not come just from the 10 grandchildren who knew her. Neighbor kids — and their parents — called her Yiayia. So did the grocery clerks down the street. Same for the mail carrier and the milkman.

Yiayia was proud of her Greek heritage and she touted it whenever possible. She was equally proud of being an American. She stood in line to vote at every election. I’ll repeat: Every election.

Yiayia was a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat, the kind we refer to in Texas as a “yellow dog Democrat.” She truly would vote for a yellow dog than vote for a Republican.

She prayed for Franklin Delano Roosevelt every Sunday in church. She displayed pictures of John F. Kennedy on a kitchen credenza. She voted in 1972 for George McGovern even though she could barely pronounce his name. I took her to vote that Election Day and asked, “Who did you vote for, Yiayia?” She looked at me sideways and said, “Nee-xohn,” laughed and then assured that of course she voted for the Democrat.

Returning to the “old country” never was an option for Yiayia. The old country was Turkey. She was an ethnic Greek whom the Turks expelled from the island of Marmara after World War I. The Greeks did the same to Turks living in Greece. Yiayia set foot in Greece one time: a brief stop in Athens en route from Istanbul to New York. She had no desire to return. Yiayia was “home” in the United States of America.

My “Papou,” George, died on Jan, 22, 1950 after visiting his month-old second-born grandson — me — at my parents’ home in Portland, Ore. He suffered a heart attack after pushing his car out of a snowdrift. Yiayia mourned him the rest of her life.

She kept on being proud of her standing as an American. She never took for granted the wonderful life she and Papou carved out for themselves and their family in this country.

Nor did she take for granted the political system that gave her a voice in the very government she adored. Yiayia and Papou were socialists at heart. They loved big, benevolent government. When given the chance to vote, she exercised that right with a gusto few of us know today.

Yiayia believed she may been more of an American those who were born here. She chose to come here, she would say. Native-born Americans were citizens by accident of birth; they made no sacrifice. They didn’t struggle with finding their way across a vast country with no knowledge of the language spoken there.

My uncle recalled this story about Yiayia’s journey to her new home in America: “When she got off the ship in New York, she had no idea how to get to Portland other than she had to take a train. She asked someone how to get to the train station. He told her where it was and asked her where she was going. She told him ‘Portland.’ He said it was only about an eight-hour ride.

“Five days later, she arrived in the other Portland, the one in Oregon.”

Intrepid? They should put Yiayia’s picture next to the word in the dictionary.

My wife may be right about Yiayia’s death. It is as if she planned it that way. It is easy to write about someone as unforgettable as her nearly four decades after her death. It also is easy to remember that she stood for so much of what we celebrate today.

Yiayia embodied unbridled love of God, family and her country.

I remember her as a great American.

And … what about the Randall County 'courthouse?'

Having wondered already about the fate of a rickety downtown Amarillo (former) office building, it’s now time to inquire about another old building.

This one’s in Canyon. It sits in the middle of The Square. It’s the Randall County “courthouse” building.

I cannot in good conscience call it a real courthouse, because it isn’t functioning as one.

The county asked voters a few years ago whether they wanted to spend public money to fix up the exterior of the 1909 structure. To my surprise, voters said “yes” to that request. So the county did as it was instructed and spent taxpayer funds to finish off the restoration of the old structure, complete with a replica of the clock tower on top.

The inside? Well, it’s as crappy as it has been for more than two decades.

The county has moved all its government functions out of the building.

County commissioners meet across the street in what once was the county jail.

The bulk of the county government operation is at the Randall County Justice Center at the northern edge of town. The district attorney’s office, district clerk’s office, all the district judges, the court at law judges all are housed there.

What, then, will happen to the old “courthouse” building? County Judge Ernie Houdashell has told me many times about deals he’s trying to strike with local entities who might be interested in acquiring the building. City Hall? The Canyon Economic Development Corporation? The Chamber of Commerce? Someone should want to move into a gleaming office building with an exterior that is lovely.

The inside of the place needs work. Lots of work.

Where's the bubbly over this jobs report?

Another Labor Department jobs report came out today.

Good news, yes? You bet.

The labor market added 288,000 jobs in June; unemployment dropped to 6.1 percent; economists say the economy has gotten its mojo back.

Break out the bubbly stuff. Toast the recovery. We’re back. Aren’t we?

http://money.cnn.com/2014/07/03/investing/june-jobs-report/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Let’s not forget that as I write this brief post, the Dow Jones Industrial market has surpassed 17,000; the S&P is at a record high as well. Investors are happy. Why aren’t the rest of us?

The gloom-and-doomers have done a great job of bad-mouthing the economy. I know it was bad around here oh, about six years ago.

Some of who were working full time saw our salaries cut. Mine got whacked by 10 percent; the company I worked for quit contributing to our retirement plan, which amounted to another 5 percent pay cut. My colleagues and I felt everyone’s pain.

The Obama administration sought to jump start the economy. The other side was predicting fiscal calamity. It didn’t happen. Quite the contrary, the reverse has occurred.

Are they going to give credit where — I believe — it is due?

Do not hold your breath.

I’ll give credit right here where I think it belongs. The president stepped up and acted boldly.

We’re now seeing the dividend.

Third time a charm for Mitt?

The political chattering class is clattering these days about a possible Mitt Romney run for the presidency — again.

The more I think about it, the more sense it makes.

History might be on Mitt’s side.

I think I’ll refer, incidentally, to the 2012 Republican presidential nominee by his first name from now on, given the media’s insistence on referring to the presumed Democratic frontrunner as Hillary.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/07/the-case-for-mitt-romney-in-2016-108532.html?hp=l7#.U7Vc31JOWt8

Mitt captured nearly 61 million votes in 2012, the highest total ever for a losing presidential candidate. He cut into President Obama’s electoral vote count from four years earlier. He had a serious chance to win the White House two years ago, but then stumbled badly when he was overheard talking about that dreaded “47 percent” of the population who’ll vote for Democrats no matter what, as they depend on government to do everything for them.

Some other stuff got in the way, too, such as Hurricane Sandy — which provided Barack Obama a chance to do some highly visible presidential things, such as go to New Jersey and put his arm around Gov. Chris Christie while promising all kinds of federal assistance.

History may foretell another Mitt candidacy.

Richard Nixon lost narrowly to John Kennedy in 1960; two years later he got thumped in the race for California governor and declared the media wouldn’t have “Dick Nixon to kick around anymore.” He came back to win the White House in 1968, got re-elected in a landslide in ’72 and, then, well, resigned because of that scandal called Watergate.

Ronald Reagan became president on his third try. He threw his hat into the ring at the 1968 GOP convention. He then challenged President Ford in 1976 and nearly took the nomination away from him. He came back in 1980 to be nominated and then went on to defeat President Carter in a blowout.

Republicans seem willing to give their show horses second and third chances.

Mitt’s capable of running a stellar campaign. He’s got the pedigree, the money and now the experience. He lost the GOP nomination in 2008, won it against a field of Republican weirdos — e.g., Michelle Bachmann and Herman Cain, to name just two of them — in ’12.

The 2016 field might not be so tough to conquer if he were to try one more time. Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Chris Christie? They all have soft spots in their armor.

Bring on Hillary vs. Mitt in 2016!

Civil Rights Act turns 50

The Civil Rights Act became law 50 years ago this week.

Every American should be grateful it did and every American should wonder whether it could be enacted today. The Politico story attached here suggests it couldn’t. I tend to agree.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/why-the-civil-rights-act-couldnt-pass-today-108496.html

Look at the picture included on the link above and you’ll notice something we little of these days. You see Democratic and Republican lawmakers standing next to the president as he signs the landmark bill into law. These days? It’s politicians of one party or the other standing in front of the cameras.

Indeed, President Johnson knew as he signed the bill that he was committing an act that would change the political landscape — possibly forever.

LBJ was a rangy Texan who became president in a moment of extreme national heartache. He then vowed to carry forward the slain president’s agenda, which included passage of civil rights legislation.

He succeeded. President Johnson was well aware the cost politically that would fall on his Democratic Party, which had been based solidly in the South, where many Democratic senators and House members opposed the Civil Rights Act. That didn’t matter to LBJ. He knew he had to push Congress to enact a bill that guaranteed every American, regardless of race, the full rights of citizenship.

LBJ reportedly said as he signed the bill that it would “cost us the South.” It did. His Dixiecrat friends in the Senate warned him it would as he lobbied them to enact the bill.

It mattered only to LBJ that the country grant full civil rights to every American.

And think also that the president himself was from a state that once seceded from the Union to fight a civil war against the government over whether states had the inherent right to allow slavery to exist.

The Civil Rights Act changed the political landscape all right. It had to happen.

Infrastructure now becomes controversial

Americans not even as old as I am can no doubt remember when infrastructure spending drew support from politicians of both parties.

It was a consensus deal. Get it done. We need those roads and bridges in tip-top shape. We drive our motor vehicles over them. We’re carrying the kids and pets in our SUVs. We’re hauling travel trailers across the country.

Hey, these are our public roads and highways and we need to spend public money to keep them maintained.

Remember those days?

They’re gone.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/obama-mocks-congress-highway-spending-108491.html

President Obama wants to spend money to fix our roads, bridges and highways. They’ll create thousands of jobs. And, yes, they’ll make our roadways safer for Mom, Dad and the Kids.

To no one’s surprise these days, Congress is digging in on that one, too.

Obama spoke the other day at a bridge that needs repair. He’s asking Congress to reauthorize money for an infrastructure trust fund that’s about to run dry. Congress isn’t moving on it. Imagine that.

The House of Representatives, where these spending initiatives begin, is run by Republicans who are angry with the Democratic president because of his taunts over his executive action. “So sue me,” Obama said the other day when he mentioned employing the executive authority he possesses.

The notion of spending money to keep the country moving safely is supposed to be a bipartisan effort. Sadly, nothing of substance enjoys bipartisan support. Who’s to blame? Republicans blame Obama; the president blames them.

The system is broken, ladies and gentlemen. Meanwhile, our bridges and highways are crumbling beneath us.

Repair our infrastructure before someone gets hurt.

What about the Barfield Building?

Since I don’t get downtown in Amarillo as much as I used to, I find myself getting caught up with normally “routine” sights.

Take the Barfield Building, at the corner of Sixth Avenue and Polk Street.

It’s still a battered hulk of a building shell. It remains unoccupied. It’s ground-level floor is boarded up. Nothing’s going on there.

I keep hearing some faint rumblings about the place, but I keep wondering: When will something ever happen to the place, either good or bad?

The developer who’s owned the building since the 1990s keeps saying he plans to round up investors to help finance its renovation. Into what remains unclear.

Another investment group of Amarillo wheelers and dealers sought to foreclose on the building, seeking to wrest it from the developer. It didn’t work. He dodged the foreclosure bullet nicely and retains ownership of the 10-story structure.

It’s been vacant for as long as I’ve lived in Amarillo. That would be 19-plus years. A lot of good things have happened around downtown, particularly in recent years. The Barfield eyesore remains one of the critical negative elements of a downtown district seeking to remake itself.

Potter County officials have told me over the years that as long as taxes are being paid on the building, that’s all that matters to them.

Should it be all that matters to city planners who want to piece together a shiny new downtown business and entertainment district that is attractive to those who — such as me — don’t visit downtown on a regular basis?

I think not.

Hey, Perry's got a good idea

Believe this or not, but Texas Gov. Rick Perry actually has put forward a constructive idea for President Obama.

Come to the Texas border with Mexico when you visit the state soon, Mr. President, and see for yourself what this immigration hubbub is all about.

Not a bad idea, governor.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/rick-perry-obama-come-to-the-border-108513.html?hp=l3

Perry made the suggestion on TV and said that if the president doesn’t visit the border region while he’s here to raise money then he doesn’t really care about the immigration crisis that’s erupted in several border states.

I’m one who doesn’t doubt Obama’s sincerity when he talks about the border crisis. It erupted when thousands of young illegal immigrants came to border states through Mexico; they hail generally from Central American nations, such as Honduras, Guatemala and Nicaragua. Many of them are children. Many of them have been caught up in human trafficking rings.

Mexico has been quite the poor neighbor in allowing these young people free transit through that country and into the United States.

Let’s suppose the president takes the governor up on his suggestion. My sincere hope is that the two men can meet privately and talk constructively to each other about how the state and the federal government can work together — for a change — on solving this pressing situation.

One more thought: If the president comes, governor, please avoid the finger-in-the-face stunt that your colleague over in Arizona pulled on the president.