Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Time to pray … for our leaders and our nation

I am going to enter into a period of prayer … yes, even for an individual I happen to detest with every fiber of my being.

That would be Donald J. Trump.

Why pray? Why now? The first answer is easy. I am a man of faith. I am a baptized Christian and I adhere to the notion that prayer isn’t the “least I can do,” but rather it is the “most I can do.” I don’t proclaim my faith loudly. I merely seek to live it quietly.

It could be argued that Trump is the most immoral, amoral, conscience-lacking man ever to hold the nation’s highest political office. Therefore, one might surmise he doesn’t deserve the prayers of the nation he’s been elected twice to lead. I’ll disagree with that view.

You see, the consequences of praying for Trump could bode well for those who watch him from afar. President George W. Bush famously told his successor, President Barack Obama, that despite their deep political differences that he would pray for the new president’s success. The reason was because prayer could produce results that benefit us all.

It must have worked. The new president enacted policies in 2009 that helped lift the nation out of a deep economic recession.

I will admit I haven’t prayed much for Trump over the course of his time in office. He has angered me beyond all I can grasp. The insults, the lack of dignity, the heartlessness, lack of humanity — all of it — have made me an angry American patriot. I think I have peaked out on my anger quotient.

That means I can now pray for success that the nation can grasp. Is Trump capable of change? Not a chance!

I am going to pray, though, for success. Trump might not deserve it. The rest of us certainly do.

Trump: Proof that ‘anyone can get elected’

Surely you recall that when Barack Obama was running for president in 2008 that he proclaimed that “nowhere can my story be told.”

He intended to remind us that that a young man with a “funny name,” with parents of different races, his being raised by his mother as a single parent could be elected president. Millions of rejoiced at the prospect that, yes, “anyone can get elected” to the nation’s highest office.

Well, let’s fast-forward to 2024. Donald Trump was running for a second term as POTUS. Joe Biden defeated him in 2020. Yet there he stood, nominated by a political party that is willing to give him a pass on all his transgressions.

  • He had been impeached twice during his first term. The second time was for inciting the horrific assault on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 that sought to overturn the 2020 election result.
  • Trump had been convicted on 34 felony counts associated with mistreatment of women.
  • His business exploits have been exposed as failures.
  • He has been shown to be a pathological liar who can’t tell the truth under any circumstance.
  • Trump has been exhibiting signs of mental decline.

I hasten to add that the notion that “anyone can get elected” has taken on a different tone than what we relished when Barack Obama was elected in 2008.

“Anyone” now means a convicted felon, a serial philanderer, a liar, an insurrectionist.

Pretty damn ugly … y’know?

Can’t get No. 44 to return … dammit!

Most of the politically oriented social media links I follow are yearning these days for Barack Obama to make a comeback. They want him to return to the Oval Office.

Well … you and I know that can’t happen. President Obama served his two terms as our elected leader and he’s busy these days working on his presidential center set to open in Chicago next year. He’s also making speeches reminding us — as if we need reminding — of the sparkling orator he continues to be.

He’s been highly critical of his immediate successor, Donald Trump, telling us “real strength” is not the result of bullying or insults.

It’s important for us to hear from past presidents in this fashion. They’ve been in the very spot that Trump now occupies. It’s also instructive to hear them recall how they responded to crises and compare them with the conduct exhibited by the current guy.

It is tempting to wish for a return to office of the likes of Barack Obama, or Bill Clinton, or George W. Bush. All of those men served two terms. The Constitution limits them to the time they served.

I am heartened somewhat by the lack of open chatter these days that Trump will try to circumvent the 22nÃ¥d Amendment. It might be that someone has persuaded the prevaricator in chief that a third term is a total non-starter. But, damn … the guy keeps scarfing up power as if he intends to stay put.

Sigh. It won’t happen. And that, ladies and gentlemen, gives me hope that our Constitution is strong and durable enough to withstand this full-on, flat-out, frontal assault on our government by the pretender in chief.

It won’t stop the calls for Barack Obama to find a way to sneak back into power. I’ll just wish the former president keeps speaking out with the grand eloquence he possesses. His message is powerful enough.

Is White House next for Trump brand?

A little more than a decade ago, President Barack Obama stood before the White House Correspondents Dinner audience and joked that Donald Trump might want to hang a huge “Trump” sign on the White House were he elected president of the United States.

The quip drew uproarious laughter. Trump, who was in the audience, wasn’t laughing.

Now, it seems that the joke isn’t so funny. Trump has just agreed to plaster his name on the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. The center board has voted to call it the “Trump Kennedy Center … “

Roll that around for a moment and consider why this is so horribly wrong. Trump’s name would appear in front of the slain president for whom the center was named … in his honor! Moreover, it’s not at all clear that the decision is legal, given that the center was named through a congressional act; therefore, it well could require an act of Congress to change the name.

Trump continues to insult the intelligence of Americans — and those around the world — through his callously disrespecful acts. Placing his name on a building intended to honor those who contribute to society’s art is beyond hideous. JFK honored the arts, along with his wife, Jacqueline. The Kennedy name alone should stand forever on the center that seeks to honor a slain — and beloved — leader of this great nation.

I am going to ask something I once thought was unthinkable: Is the White House really immune from this type of PR chicanery?

Wanting to repeal the 22nd

Time for an admission that I hate making, but I’ll do so anyway out of fairness to the integrity of the issue at hand.

As I watch the 44th president of the United States hit the campaign stump for fellow Democrats, I am filled partially with the desire to repeal the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, the one that limits presidents to two elected terms.

Barack Obama still has the chops to stir ’em up. He can deliver applause lines like no other politician I have witnessed in the 40-some years I have been covering and watching presidential politics.

Republicans in Congress had grown fearful of an imperial presidency after Franklin Roosevelt was elected to a fourth term in 1944. He took office in March of 1945 and died a month later. FDR was a dead man walking, suffering from blood clots, one of which traveled to his brain and took him out. The GOP intended to preserve the presidency for the common American who could seek the office.

Then we got the clown we have now. Donald Trump won in 2016, lost in 2020, only to refuse to accept that he lost. He instigated the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection. He won again in 2024.

Democrats now are turning to the one home-run hitter sitting on the bench. He’s a former president who reminds us how Republicans used to criticize Democrats for even wanting to talk to Vladimir Putin. Now the former KGB spy is having a “Bromance with Trump,” but that’s OK!

Trouble with Trump, though, is that POTUS No. 47 doesn’t give a crap about the obvious truth coming from Obama … not to mention all the other presidential predecessors.

We won’t repeal the 22nd Amendment. I am actually fine with it. I just wish at times the part of me that resides in Fantasyland could affect public policy in real time.

Why Epstein matters

I have sought to come to grips with why the media continue to report on Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged relationship with Donald J. Trump. I have figured out why this story matters.

It matters because it could tell us about the relationships that the president of the United States kept not many years before he won election to the White House.

Epstein, of course, is dead, having hanged himself in a jail cell in New York City. His former girlfriend/accomplice is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex traffricking of underage girls.

The story revolves around the “Epstein files” and what they contain pertaning to Trump’s friendship with the hideous sex trafficker and child molester.

Do I think Trump took part in these hideous activities? No, I do not. Whether he did or didn’t, though, is not the point of finding out what’s in those files. What the public ought to know is this: Did the man who would run for POTUS hang around the seediest man alive and was he actually friends with an individual who he might have known to be the animal we know him to be?

Therein lies the media interest in this matter. It also cuts to the heart of why Democrats and some right-wing MAGA Republicans want this information released to the public. Trump calls it all a “hoax,” meaning he believes all those known victims of Epstein are liars. How does this individual look in the mirror after denigrating victims of sex crimes?

Don’t answer that. I know. He does it because he has zero conscience.

The conscience-free president of the United States finds himself in a tightening circle of evidence that he knew Epstein far more intimately than he’s letting on.

Do you remember when Sen. Barack Obama got pilloried because his preacher once cursed the United States over its slavery policy? Obama, who was running for president in 2008, issued a public statement rebuking the preacher — a longtime friend of his — and then quit attending the man’s church.

I can find no sign of such contrition coming from Trump. He blames the victims for fomenting a “Democrat hoax.” Meanwhile, the questions keep mounting and the public is beginning to ask: Did we really elect to the presidency an individual who would cozy up to scum such as this?

That’s why this story matters.

Wishing POTUS well carries self interest

If we’re honest with ourselves, and most Americans fall into that category, we would carry a significant self-interest load while wishing the president of the United States success as he seeks to lead the country.

Where am I going with this? Here it comes.

I want Donald Trump to succeed in the office he will occupy for the next three years and some. I want him to succeed — particularly on economic issues — because it will have a direct impact more than likely on my retirement.

I’m long in the tooth, heading soon for my 76th birthday. I am semi-retired, working part time as a freelance reporter for a group of weekly newspapers in Collin County, Texas, where I have lived for six years. I also am drawing my retirement income from Social Security.

I have entrusted my retirement account to the care of a wise investment counselor who has taken good care of me, helped in large part by the performance of the stock market, which reacts almost daily to the whims of the president, be he a Democrat or Republican. The market did well during the terms of Barack Obama and Joe Biden, but my support for their success went far beyond self-interest motivations.

So, when I declare my good wishes on the current POTUS, I do so with more than a twinge of self-interest. I detest the man for who he is, what he did before being elected to the only public office he ever has sought, for the lives he has destroyed, for the lies he has told, for his absolute lack of character, empathy and compassion.

I do wish him success as he seeks to manage the nation’s economic policy. It’s not because I have faith that his decisions will fatten my retirement investments … but because if he makes the right call — somehow! — good fortune will come my way.

Gabbard and the ‘t’ word

Some words need never to be said given the extreme weight of what they mean … unless the object of that word has done something that deserves its use.

Former President Barack Obama has been called, essentially, a traitor to the nation he served for more than a decade. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard tossed the word “treason” out during a discussion of what she was “proof” that Obama fiddled with intelligence reports that accuse Russia of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Gabbard doesn’t possess a shred of proof of that accusation. Instead of fixing like a laser on actual national security concerns, Gabbard is relitigating the 2016 election … which, I hasten to add, Donald Trump won! Trump garnered more Electoral College votes than Hillary Clinton. Period. Full stop. And all that rhetorical nonsense.

So, what the hell is Gabbard doing by seeking to bring up an issue that has been decided? Oh, wait! I know why! She wants to divert our attention from the Jeffrey Epstein matter and whether the late Epstein and Trump were besties during the time Epstein was shopping for underage girls to pawn off on clients in a sex trafficking scheme.

Gabbard is running amok with dangerous language that she should not use. Surely she knows the penalty for treason, right? If not, here it is: If convicted, it’s death!

I want to alert High Plains Blogger critics that I have refrained from accusing Trump of treason. Other have done so. That’s their call. Mine is to pull that punch … at least until we have evidence of a treasonous act.

To that end, DNI Gabbard needs to keep her trap shut!

Voters are a confusing bunch

The run-of-the-mill American voter appears to suffer from some form of political schizophrenia.

Think about this for a moment, because that might be all the time you care to ponder what I am about to put forth.

Americans twice elected a young man who blazed trails everywhere he went, as the first Black editor of the Harvard Journalism Review, the first Black president of the United States, who was faithful to his wife and who avoided any semblance of scandal during his two terms in the White House.

Then voters in 2016 and in 2024 elected arguably the dumbest man ever to hold the office, who has acknowledged cheating on all three of his wives, who paid a porn actress to keep quiet about a sexual encounter he said never happened, who has never acknowledged a single failure in his professional life, who denigrates war heroes and Gold Star families, who evaded the draft during the Vietnam War, who selects certifiable morons to serve in the Cabinet, who lies at a breathtaking pace, who provoked an armed attack on the federal government to stop the certification of a free, fair and legal presidential election in 2020, the one that the president has never admitted he lost.

This is the kind of strange behavior that defies description. It challenges anyone to explain how an electorate can transform itself from a body of Americans dedicated to real-life change for the better to one that falls victim to a cretin’s call to follow him backward into the era of Jim Crow.

My hope is a simple one. That we can reverse what we have done to our nation in 2026 and again in 2028. We are far better than what we have delivered to ourselves in the form of a national government.

What about the oath?

Every so often I spend part of my day at home watching YouTube of news events, many of which involve the president of the United States acting in his role as commander in chief.

I saw one the other day and it compels me to share something that President Obama said while awarding the Medal of Honor to a Navy SEAL. He said the special forces that operate in all our military branches adhere to a code that says they shouldn’t seek attention or glory for the actions they perform in defense of our country. They operate in the shadows, he said, eschewing the limelight.

The comments drew me immediately to the conduct of a SEAL who took part in the May 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden. The individual apparently didn’t adhere to the special forces vow to remain anonymous.

Oh, no. Instead, this fellow decided to make a big deal out of what he said happened that night in Pakistan when SEALs and their Army pilots landed in the compound where bin Laden was hiding. This guy claimed to have fired the shots that killed bin Laden. He’s written a book about it. He’s appeared on TV talk shows to tell the world about what he said he did.

The young man who received the Medal of Honor from President Obama is what is described as a “special warfare operator.” Obama made the point that the fellow, who’s now retired from the Navy, would rather be anywhere else in the world than at the White House surrounded by officials, well-wishers and TV cameras.

That’s the way heroes roll. They do their job at great risk to their own safety. Then they go home. They await the next order to suit up and deploy into harm’s way.

The SEAL to seemingly boast about his role in taking out bin Laden only cheapens what went down that moonless night in Pakistan. I just wish he would have kept his trap shut.