Category Archives: International news

Words are failing me

Allow me this brief admission, which is that my meager command of English is failing me as I search for expressions to condemn the actions of the charlatan who sits in the Oval Office.

I am running out of ways to knee-cap Donald Trump’s efforts to disobey international law, to ignore the federal courts and to seize control of a sovereign government because its leader follows policies that Trump abhors.

Get this, kids. Now Trump appears to be ratcheting up the chatter associated with a possible takeover of Greenland, an Arctic island that exists as a territory of Denmark.

Greenland is no speck in the Arctic Ocean. It covers about 836,000 square miles, or about three times as much land mass as Texas. Someone will have to explain to me — in language I can understand — precisely why Trump would want Greenland. It’s covered in ice most of the year. Almost no human being lives there. But Trump seems to suggest he wants it. What the ever-lovin’ hell has POTUS been swilling?

The Danes aren’t going to surrender Greenland. Denmark, just like Venezuela, is a sovereign nation and it has held Greenland for several hundred years.

I cannot grasp whatever reason is rattling around Trump’s vacuous skull about why he wants Greenland. I am going to have to settle on a conclusion that Trump’s delusions of godhood and grandeur need to be reined in … right now!

What? We’re going to ‘run’ Venezuela?

Donald John Trump got elected to his office on the basis of a number of key promises he blurted out while campaigning.

One of them was to “end the pointless wars that seem to go on forever.”

Well … kids. The moron in chief has just gotten us into another war. He launched a mission to take out the Venezuelan president, Nicolas Maduro, and his wife. And now he says the United States is going to “run” Venezuela.

What in the name of hostile takeover is this dipshit doing?

Young Americans are going to die now carrying out the mission of running a once-sovereign nation. You can take that to the bank. Does anyone alive with half a noodle in their skull believe the Venezuelans are going to roll over and let the United States take over governing their country? And that they will do so without a fight?

Let’s be clear on one point. Trump’s attack on Venezuela does follow a similar pattern launched in 1989 when President George H.W. Bush sent troops to Panama to fetch Manuel Noriega, remove him from power and take him to the United States to stand trial for drug trafficking. I don’t recall President Bush ordering troops to run Panama.

Trump has gone mad. Regime change now appears to be the motivation behind those idiotic strikes on alleged “drug boats” in Caribbean Sea. Nicolas Maduro has been taken to the United States to stand trial as well on drug charges.

I cannot ascribe motives to why Trump took this action. Maduro was a sovereign head of state. I get that he’s a bad guy. He’s not the only one out there.

One must ask these key questions, given that two of our nation’s adversaries, China and Russia, are watching this clusterfu** unfold. What does this action mean for finding an end to the Ukraine war and will our incursion into Venezuela embolden China to do something similar to Taiwan?

God help us …

Don’t close consulate!

Benjamin Netanyahu was so upset over the election of New York City’s first Muslim mayor, why … he is threatening to close the Israeli consulate office in the Big Apple.

Please heed this advice from an American patriot who once spent five weeks in the enchanting nation: Don’t do it, Mr. Prime Minister!

If ever there was a time to keep the lines of communication open and unobstructed, it is right now. NYC Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s election was a stunner, for sure, to those who value the close U.S.-Israeli ties. I happen to one American who does value our alliance with Israel.

I also happen to believe it would be a mistake to close the consulate in the nation’s largest city, which gives Israel direct contact with millions of Jewish-Americans who call NYC home. Closing the consulate would be an act of supreme petulance at a time when we need maturity and reason at the highest levels of international diplomacy.

I don’t know it the Israeli prime minister was just venting his anger or if he intends to follow through with his threat. This much is clear. We live in a democratic republic where we should accept election results for better or for worse.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu needs to settle down, perhaps call the new mayor and seek a way to end the ongoing crises in the Middle East. It won’t happen if he closes the consulate in a fit of rage.

Don’t forget: Hamas is a terrorist regime

Amid all the hype and hubbub over the ceasefire that has been declared in Gaza, it is wise to remember an essential element about this situation.

One of the combatant forces, Hamas, is a terrorist regime committed to the destruction of Israel. Hamas has released hostages held since the Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack. That’s fine. The world is heralding their release. The world also is heaping praise on Donald Trump for his role in brokering the deal.

However, the world has many miles to go before this matter comes full circle.

The task for Trump and his team is to remain laser focused on the obstacles that lie before them.

How do Hamas and Israel reach an understanding that presumes Israel is a permanent player? What assurances do the Israelis expect if they are to exist without the threat of further violence? What about a two-state solution that requires an independent Palestinian state functioning alongside an independent Israel? Who will pay for the reconstruction of Gaza, which the Israelis destroyed when they went to war after the terror attack?

Donald Trump has exhibited a remarkable skill in recent weeks by bringing the warring sides to this stage in their conflict. I wish him well, which is to say I wish the world well, as this process proceeds.

Just don’t forget with whom we are dealing. Hamas is first and foremost an organization that aims to terrorize the world.

If they can do this, why not do that?

Maybe you’ve uttered this expression of frustration yourself over the years … and it goes something like this: If they can land a man on the moon, why can’t they solve this problem here on Earth?

I’ll admit to expressing such a thought myself in the past 24 hours in the wake of Donald Trump’s brokering of a deal that well could lead to an end of centuries of bloodshed in the Middle East.

If the president of the United States can clunk the heads of Israeli and terrorist leaders together to get them to stop killing each other, why can’t he do the same with Republicans and Democrats who are digging in while the federal government remains shut down?

House Speaker Mike Johnson is keeping the House off the clock until Senate Democrats agree to a stopgap spending plan to reopen the government. No can do, say Democrats, who contend the GOP plan will gut insurance benefits for many thousands of Americans.

Meanwhile, Trump is basking in the deserved glow of success in the Middle East. The government he has been tasked to running, though, remains dark with no solution in sight.

What the hell? Let’s get busy and fix this matter … shall we?

Congrats to Trump, but wait …

High Plains Blogger readers know of my intense dislike of Donald J. Trump, his policies and the very idea that he is sitting in the Oval Office. Yet I have stated my intention to offer him praise when he has earned it … and I did so with the announcement of a ceasefire in Gaza that well could end the bloodshed between Hamas and the Israeli Defense Force.

Why, though, does Trump insist on stepping on his own applause lines by saying the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, a Venezuelan political dissenter, said that he had earned the prize over her efforts? My question is: Did she do so or is Trump making this up to cast himself in some pseudo-heroic light?

I saw a video of then-President Barack Obama declaring that he had won the Peace Prize in 2009, about two weeks into his presidency. He acknowledged freely that he felt uncomfortable having his name posted alongside “transformative figures” who had won it previously. He mentioned Albert Schweitzer, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., Elie Wiesel as historic giants who had earned the prize. Obama saw his award as a testament to the expectation that he could deliver on his promise to bring a new world order.

Trump lobbied aggressively for the Peace Prize. I won’t begrudge him that effort. He isn’t the first to do so. He won’t be the last. He is just so damn awkward as he seeks to put words in other people’s mouths. I want to hear from the 2025 Peace Prize winner herself what she told Trump. I mean, the POTUS’s penchant for prevarication overtakes every single word that flies out of his mouth.

Trump earns affirmation

Donald J. Trump is continually searching for affirmation of deeds he has accomplished … and even deeds with which he had zero involvement.

Well, ladies and gents, if it turns out to be true that Trump brokered a deal that could end the Gaza war started two years ago when Hamas bombarded the territory in a hideous missile attack, then he will have earned all the acclaim he has sought.

I am willing to give it to him.

Trump announced that Hamas and the Israeli government have agreed on a ceasefire that will lead to the release of all Israelis held hostage by Hamas and the release of Palestinians held by Israelis. Then will come the immediate rebuilding of Gaza City, destroyed by Israeli troops, artillery and armor in retaliation for the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023.

Israel had vowed to destroy Hamas, the terrorists who govern Gaza. By all accounts, Israel has inflicted heavy damage to Hamas’s command structure. The price in civilian casualties has been ghastly, with more than 60,000 Palestinians killed in the war that erupted. Israel reportedly bombed hospitals, schools and countless civilian neighborhoods in its ongoing offensive.

Yes, it is time for the carnage to end. And if Donald Trump wants to take a bow for helping bring it an end, then I will be among the first to salute him. Please, though, just accept the applause with a modicum of class and decorum.

Nobel Peace Prize? Hah!

For the ever-lovin’ life of me I don’t know really why I am wasting my energy on this issue, but it seems to be getting traction in some circles … although nowhere near me.

Donald Trump appears to be lobbying for consideration to get the Nobel Peace Prize. I cannot think of a least worthwhile nominee for that cherished prize than that fellow.

I guess he sees his efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war as sufficient cause to award him the prize.

To be sure, the Nobel committee has misfired a time or two on these picks. I believe the Nobel prize panel missed the mark when it named newly elected President Obama its 2009 Peace Prize recipient. It did so on the hope he would bring peace after nearly eight years of war during President Bush’s two terms in office.

To his credit, Obama recognized what I think he realized was a mistake when he accepted the award. At least he acknowledged the unusual circumstances of his selection.

But … the idea that the Nobel panel could even consider Trump for this high honor simply boggles the noggin. Whatever peace deal emerges from the bloodshed likely will contain multiple concessions to the aggressor nation — which happens to be Russia. Surely the wise folks who hand this prestigious award to deserving winners can find someone who actually deserves it.

Germans have it pegged

I don’t know many Germans well, as I have only two actual friends: a husband and wife who live in Nuremberg with their three children.

Yes, I have shaken the hands of other Germans during two visits there, one in 2016 with my bride, Kathy Anne, and the other in 2024. When the subject of Donald Trump comes up, they all sing off the same page: They tell me that the onset of authoritarian rule comes in dribs and drabs, that the individual who seeks power gathers it up in bite-sized pieces. Before long — presto! — he’s acquired all the power he needs to affect serious change in the country he seeks to lead.

My friends tell me that is what they are witnessing in this country. Yes, it’s from some distance away. However, my friends are both well-educated, well-versed in government and public policy and know a dictator-in-waiting when they see him.

Many observers in Europe are wondering the same thing as well. Why are we Americans allowing this to happen?

I also have made friends in countries affected directly by Adolf Hitler’s megalomaniacism. Several live in The Netherlands, a few more live in Greece and I have shaken hands with a couple of Danes in Copenhagen and some Brits in the UK. They understand what can happen when a madman takes control of the levers of power.

I am going to cling to my faith that Americans will never tolerate what so many around the world suggest is happening here. It is all outrageous, enraging, despicable and poses an existential threat to the principles upon which the founders created what would become the world’s indispensable nation.

Yes, I have referred to Trump as a madman. I do not believe he is capable of committing the level of genocide we saw in the 1930s and ’40s. The rest of it? I’ll need to wait for him to be vanquished.

Who’s talking to whom?

At this moment, I am a confused old man, given that I cannot tell who is talking to whom regarding this bizarre trail many of hope leads to a ceasefire in Ukraine.

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin talked to each other for a time in Anchorage. Volodymr Zelenskyy was nowhere near the conference room, but he damn sure should have been there.

Zelenskyy and Trump met in the Oval Office, along with several other European Union heads of state and government who were there to support the embattled Ukrainian president.

Trump is now insisting that Putin and Zelenskyy talk to each other, but only after dismissing the idea as a non-starter. Why? Because Putin didn’t want to talk to the man with whom he launched a war three years ago.

Trump now says he will seek an end to mail-in voting … because Putin thinks that kind of balloting is prone to fraud and corruption. What the hell? Putin is the godfather of electoral fraud, having emerged on top in numerous Russian presidential elections with an 80% majority.

Can you say and spell “r-i-g-g-e-d?”

The wild card in all of this, naturally, is Trump. Which is what I presume suits him just fine. He likes being unpredictable. Says it gives him an edge. Except that he hasn’t closed any deals to end the war, which he pledged to do on Day One of his second term in office.

I didn’t study foreign relations much in college and most of what I understand about it I learned during my nearly 37 years as a print journalist.

However, I am pretty sure this isn’t how international diplomacy is supposed to work.