Mask-mandate issue takes strange turn in Austin

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

What in the world do we make of this news?

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, the king of the no-mask-mandate realm of Republicans politicians, has been diagnosed as carrying the COVID-19 virus. He attended a political gathering in Collin County where — reportedly — there wasn’t a mask to be seen on anyone’s puss!

The governor is not showing symptoms. His wife, Cecilia, has tested negative. Those closest to the governor are undergoing tests. Abbott is isolating within the Governor’s Mansion.

Two thoughts come to mind immediately.

First, I wish Gov. Abbott a speedy and complete recovery. Really. I do. I do not want anyone — even pols who pi** me off with their reckless anti-mask-mandate rhetoric — to suffer from this disease.

Second, it is fair to wonder whether a positive test for a potentially fatal disease might turn Abbott from being a mask-mandate denier to someone who understands why local community leaders need the flexibility to issue mask mandates for themselves.

OK, I “wonder” about it. Will it happen? I doubt seriously that Abbott is going to reverse himself … just because he has tested positive for a virus that can be fended off by a face mask.

Abbott has been handed a bit of a public-relations setback with this COVID diagnosis. It counters the judicial support he got from the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court that has upheld his no-mandate authority, saying that he has the power to tell local governments they can do nothing more than what he allows them to do. I hate disagreeing with the learned justices … but they’re full of crap-ola!

Dallas public school officials are continuing to issue mask orders, along with their colleagues in Fort Worth, Houston and Austin. Our school leaders in Princeton, where my wife and I live, are leaving it to parents to decide; it turns out I see a lot of masks on children as they play in the school yard down the street from our house … which pleases me greatly.

There surely will be a lot of tittering over Gov. Abbott’s COVID diagnosis. I won’t go there. I intend to focus on his stubborn refusal to allow local officials determine the best way to protect their constituents against a disease that could kill them.

A little more perspective, OK?

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

President Biden is taking a lot of unjustified heat over his decision to end our military involvement in Afghanistan.

It is coming in the form of criticism over the lack of preparation for evacuating allies and those Afghans who helped us during the 20-year war. The Taliban stormed into Kabul this week and have seized control of a government they once ran with ruthless depravity.

I want to share this brief notion.

Joe Biden was the fourth president of the United States to deal with the Taliban and with a potential end game of the Afghan War. Did he present a coherent, comprehensive exit strategy that included caring for the translators and others who assisted us during the conflict? No.

However, Presidents Bush, Obama and Trump all had their opportunities to craft an end strategy as well. What they did any of them do to care for the men and women who aided us? Did any of those former presidents seek to develop a strategy to use once we declared an end to this war? No! They didn’t.

So as their successor, Joe Biden, struggles with seeking to manage this end game, he is taking heat that isn’t entirely justified. He inherited a mess — one of many — from his immediate predecessor, who let us remember actually sought to negotiate an end to the war with the Taliban. That didn’t go well, either.

Joe Biden declared that the “buck stops” with him. He is now the president and he takes full responsibility for his actions and for all the consequences they bring. He’s a grownup and is more than able to withstand the pounding he is taking.

However, I want to cut the POTUS just a bit of slack. He didn’t create the problem. Indeed, none of the three men who preceded him developed any strategy to deal with the chaos that is unfolding.

Put this into perspective

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

Let’s take a moment, take a few deep breaths, and seek to put the Afghanistan collapse and turmoil into a bit of perspective.

President Biden’s decision to end our military involvement comes directly on the heels of a deal negotiated by his immediate predecessor, who sought to work with the Taliban on a withdrawal of our forces.

You’ll recall that POTUS 45 actually invited the Taliban terrorists to Camp David for a summit on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks in 2020. It didn’t occur, given the outrage expressed at the time.

The former POTUS wanted us out of there by May of this year. He got defeated for re-election. Joe Biden stepped up and decided to end the conflict right now. So … he did.

President Biden had set the 20th year since 9/11 as the date we would leave; he chose instead to move up a bit.

All of this had been planned by the previous administration. Where the current administration fell short has been in the planning for the evacuation of our Afghan allies, the people who helped us during the 20-year war. Yes, the Biden administration deserves criticism for the way it has mishandled that element.

However, the withdrawal was set in motion many months before President Biden took office.

And yet, we now hear from Republican members of Congress seeking to invoke constitutional powers to strip Biden of his presidential authority. Some of the GOP fruitcakes keep yammering about the president’s mental acuity.

Rick Scott raises removing Biden from office over Afghanistan – POLITICO

They’re full of sh**!

Our nation was pulled kicking and screaming into full terrorist alert on 9/11. To my way of thinking, we remain much more vigilant now to the dangers of foreign terror attacks than we were prior to that hideous event two decades ago. President Biden vows a robust response from our military if we detect any potential threat from the Taliban. Trust me on this, the Taliban do not want to face the wrath of the world’s most powerful military force.

I want to give the president a bit more time to hash out the details that admittedly should have been reckoned with prior to the withdrawal.

As for our allies in Afghanistan who are clamoring for safe haven, they need our help immediately. I believe President Biden is working to give it to them at soon as is humanly possible.

Biden gives speech of his life?

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

Jim Boyd once wrote editorials for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.

He is a friend of mine; I have known Boyd for more than 30 years. He and I have one other thing in common — besides being former editorialists. We served in Vietnam; both of us were in the Army. Boyd worked in “the bush”; I did not.

My friend today endorsed President Biden’s speech to the nation about the tragedy in Afghanistan. Boyd takes a different view than what I have expressed. I want to share it here. It’s a brief Facebook post, so bear with me.

Biden just gave the best foreign policy speech of my lifetime. He learned the lessons of Vietnam and Iraq — needlessly spending the lives of Americans and residents of those countries in pursuit of mistaken policies — and then he applied it in mission-creeped Afghanistan. It was the clearest, truest statement on refusing to waste American lives I have ever heard. And I have been listening since I went in the Army in 1968. Bravo, bravo, President Biden.

The president’s decision to pull our forces out of Afghanistan was a sound call. I would argue only that the logistics of the withdrawal has been, shall we say, clumsy.

The criticism of the president’s policy pronouncement has centered on the lack of planning for the protection of the thousands of allies we employed while fighting the Taliban. They served as interpreters, deep-cover operatives, staff personnel. They want out of Afghanistan. President Biden did not produce an evacuation plan prior to making his decision to pull out. Should he have done so in advance? Of course!

However, what I heard today from the president was a clear and unambiguous statement of ownership of a critical decision, just as President Kennedy took the heat for the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961. President Biden stood strongly behind his decision to end a war that had become something that one of his predecessors, George W. Bush, didn’t foresee … at least not publicly.

Indeed, President Bush pulled his own eyes off the target when he ordered the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 on the double-barreled phony mantra that (a) Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and (b) he had something to do with the 9/11 attacks.

So, our nation’s war effort in Afghanistan has ended. There will be no more American lives lost on this particular far-away field of battle.

I join my friend in saying, “Bravo, President Biden.” 

Biden said what he had to say

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

President Biden has said the only thing he could possibly say with regard to the Afghanistan government’s collapse and the Taliban takeover in that war-shattered nation.

He said “The buck stops with me” and he takes ownership of the decision to end our involvement in the longest war in our nation’s history. There would be no way on God’s good Earth that he could reverse course, express regret about the decision he made and send tens of thousands of U.S. troops back onto the battlefield.

There would be no way to find a different solution “five years ago” or “15 years in the future,” Biden said.

Fair enough. Our war is over. The suffering in Afghanistan is far from over. The Taliban has marched into Kabul more quickly than anyone expected.

I am terribly conflicted by what is happening. I want our men and women to come home, too. I am tired of our involvement in a civil war that one side — the so-called good guys — was unwilling to fight. Biden said we supplied the Afghan armed forces with billions of dollars, state-of-the-art equipment, the best training possible. President Biden noted correctly, though, that no amount of money could pay for a fighting force that is unwilling to fight.

Thus, the prospect of Afghan women being returned to subhuman status draws my intense ire. However, the Afghan armed forces were ordered to defend against that occurring … and they failed in their mission.

Collin County Judge Chris Hill — a conservative Republican — calls the events a revival of the Jimmy Carter presidency; he calls it “Jimmy Carter 2.0.” No surprise there.

The situation is still unfolding. We do not know how it will play out. I am going to hope for the best.

As for President Biden, this is why we’re paying him the big bucks.

More in common than we thought

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

A most startling thing happened to me today and I want to share it briefly.

I wrote a blog in the past day or so that was highly critical of the 45th president of the United States. It drew an angry response from a reader who called me an “idiot.” My oldest friend on Earth responded to this fellow and defended my honor; I am grateful for that show of support.

Then this individual noted that we have a common friend, a guy we both knew in high school back in Portland, Ore. I didn’t recognize his name; it turns out he ended up graduating from a nearby high school and didn’t attend the same high school as my friend and me during our senior years. We exchanged messages via Facebook about our common friend. We all served in Vietnam, they in the Marine Corps, me in the Army.

We shared a thought or two about our friend and about our shared service. Then this same guy who called me an idiot expressed that we have “more in common” than we thought.

A little while later, this fellow extended a Facebook “friend” request to me. I accepted it. Now we’re hooked up on social media.

I find that so very strange in a pleasant sort of way. In this time of extreme political polarization, the opposite too often occurs; longtime friends sever their friendship over … politics.

I hope my shiny new friendship survives after he reads more of my political posts, which I share on social media platforms, such as Facebook. I remain confident it will.

No repeat of Vietnam?

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

U..S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said today that the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban is “manifestly not like Saigon” in 1975 after the North Vietnamese army took control of the country where more than 58,000 Americans died in battle.

I beg to differ.

The image of Taliban fighters pouring into Kabul reminds many of us precisely of what happened in Vietnam. President Biden said that it would be “highly unlikely” that the Taliban would control everything. Hmm. It didn’t work out that way, Mr. President.

Now comes the remaking of a government in the mold of a harsh regime run by men with a dastardly history of subjugating women. The Taliban, you’ll remember, gave safe haven to the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.

I happen to believe it was time to end our battlefield involvement in Afghanistan. To that end, President Biden made the correct policy decision. The implementation of that decision, though, leaves plenty of questions to answer.

Why didn’t the military apparatus we supposedly trained to defend the country resist more fervently? Why wasn’t there a strategy laid out for caring for the personnel who aided us during our nation’s longest war? How can we protect our interests against the Taliban terrorists who well might begin plotting to do harm to us? What will Afghanistan look like when the Taliban establish the government?

Secretary Blinken is an honorable man. However, what we have witnessed today is absolutely similar — indeed, it is virtually identical — to what occurred in Vietnam. He needs to change the narrative.

Un-vaxxed: Stay away from me

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

The disgraceful politicization of the COVID-19 vaccine effort continues apace.

It’s a sad state of affairs into which we have entered. Politics is now driving a good portion of Americans’ decision whether to receive the vaccines that are available to ward off potentially fatal infections from COVID-19.

I want to share a view expressed by someone on my Facebook “friends” network. This individual wrote:

“I don’t know your medical history and it’s none of my business. Get the vaccine or don’t get the vaccine. That’s your choice. My choice is this. You won’t be welcome at my house if you are not vaccinated. I wish peace and good health to anyone to happens to read this post.”

So … there you have it. I hereby am going to adopt that philosophy.

The good news is that we don’t chum around with those who are fervently anti-vaccination. Our friends and immediate family members all are pro-vaccine. To my knowledge they all have received both doses of whatever vaccine they received, be it Pfizer, Moderna or Johnson & Johnson.

The maddening aspect of all of this has been the anger, angst and stubbornness of those who continue to buy into goofy notions about phony “side effects” of the vaccines. You’ve heard ’em , right? You take the vaccine and you become a chimpanzee; or your skin takes on some sort of adhesive quality; or that you become a eunuch.

Let’s see … more than 160 million Americans have been vaccinated and no one has come forth with any evidence that they have become a chimp.

So the specious argument continues. Why? Because you can’t talk sensibly to those who adhere to nonsense.

The anti-vaxxers bitch about losing their “freedom.” Hey, they are free to do — or refuse to do — whatever they damn well please.

Just stay the hell away from me and my family. Are we clear?

Optimism put to test

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

Those of you who know me best will understand that I am an eternal optimist. I tend to see the best in people; too often, I admit that they let me down.

My wife tends to look more skeptically at individuals she meets for the first time, which is smart in that it saves her the grief of dealing with disappointment.

My optimism extends also to the state and strength of our nation, which I admit fully and freely is undergoing many stresses that threaten its very fabric.

The pandemic continues to ravage our population. We are ending a war in Afghanistan and are watching the bad guys seize the government they once ran. We have a former president of the United States whose cult following continues to wreak havoc on our democratic processes.

Will any of these factors individually doom our nation? Will they do so collectively? Can we stop any of these things from reaching critical mass? Can we stop them all?

No and yes to the first and second set of questions. At least that is how I see it.

Our framers crafted a government built to withstand these challenges. They sought to create “a more perfect Union.” They knew better than to seek absolute perfection. They knew the nation under construction in the 18th century would be an ongoing work in progress likely for as long as the republic existed.

I am going to retain my optimism even as we struggle with these battles. Indeed, any concession to the worst-case scenarios out there would consign me to a level of anxiety that I am not sure I could handle.

So, perhaps my optimism is a self-defense strategy. Whatever. I’ll maintain it until the bottom falls out and rely on the wisdom that President Ford offered when he took office at the end of an earlier monumental crisis.

He told us: “Our Constitution works.”

Liz Cheney: doomed!

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

By John Kanelis / johnkanelis_92@hotmail.com

As I watch the once-great Republican Party devolve into a collection of cultists, I am left to lament the pending political demise of a GOP politician who has the temerity to stand for the rule of law.

U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming is facing a certain primary challenge next year. She now appears likely to lose that contest to a challenger who has swilled the Kool-Aid dispensed by the former Insurrectionist in Chief.

This pending turn of events saddens me terribly.

It’s not necessarily that Rep. Cheney stands tall in my gallery of political heroes. I am not a fan of her conservative politics. I am a fan of her stand against the former POTUS’s actions on 1/6 when he incited the riot of terrorists who stormed the Capitol Building and sought to stop the certification of the results of the 2020 presidential election.

The House of Representatives impeached the ex-POTUS a second time for that act. Cheney joined a handful of Republican lawmakers who voted to impeach him. She has stood firm on the oath she took to defend the Constitution. Cheney said the party is not beholden to any individual.

For that she is going to face a stern primary challenge in Wyoming. I fear she is going to lose. She might lose bigly.

The country would be worse off if she is replaced by another cultist.