Trump faces fabulous irony: losing to a woman

clinton and trump

There’s more than a touch of irony in the prospect of Donald J. Trump losing the presidential election to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

It rests in Trump’s view of women and the undeniable probability that he’s about to get thumped by one of them on Nov. 8.

You’ve heard about Trump’s consistent references to the female anatomy. You even have heard him refer to his own daughter’s looks and how if he weren’t her father, he’d be dating her.

Then, of course, we have the well-chronicled Trumpish description of women as “fat pigs,” which Fox News debate moderator Megyn Kelly brought up in that notable first Republican primary debate this past fall.

One of the many undercurrents of Trump’s reputation preceding his entry into national politics has been his view of women as something less than his equal. It’s a curious and troubling trend that has come from Trump over many years.

The sexism is apparent — if not outright blatant.

So here we are. We’re two months exactly away from the vote-counting for the presidency.

Sure, the polls — which Trump loves to tout — are tightening. Trump has done a masterful job of casting all shades of negative light on Clinton. Don’t forget, too, that some of that negativity has centered on her “physical stamina” and his contention that she isn’t up to the job of becoming commander in chief.

Is that a sexist campaign ploy? Well … I believe it is.

Oh, the irony.

Pence breaks with Trump on Obama’s birth

FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2015 file photo, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence announces that the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services has approved the state's waiver request for the plan his administration calls HIP 2.0, during a speech in Indianapolis. Pence said Wednesday that he regrets the "confusion" caused by a memo about a planned state-run news website and will scrap the project if it doesn't "respect the role of a free and independent press." (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

 

The Republican Party’s presidential ticket has at least one voice of reason, and it’s not the man at the top of the ticket.

No. The reasonable, sane voice comes from the vice presidential nominee, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, who has broken with presidential nominee Donald Trump on the most outrageous element of his campaign for the White House: that Barack Obama was born somewhere other than Hawaii, one of the nation’s 50 states.

Pence said he accepts that President Obama is duly qualified to hold his office, that he isn’t a foreign-born imposter that Trump has alleged for longer than Obama has been president.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/pence-trump-obama-birther-comments-2278404

So, there you have it. Pence is on board. Will his running mate — the goofball reality TV celebrity/real estate mogul/politician buy in?

I don’t really care. Trump’s assertion of President Obama constitutional illegitimacy is laughable on its face.

No motor vehicles allowed?

nuremberg street

NUREMBERG, Germany — Let’s think way, way, way outside the box for a moment … or maybe two.

Amarillo is trying to redesign, reconfigure and reinvent its downtown business district. City political and civic leaders have this idea of turning it into something of an entertainment district keyed in part to a couple of venues: the Globe-News Center for the Performing Arts and the to-be-built multipurpose event venue.

The thought occurred to me today while strolling through a much older city than Amarillo: Why not try something really radical, something that has met with some success in a place such as, oh, Nuremberg?

This city known as much for a series of trials that occurred here after World War II as it is for its astounding beauty and ambience has developed a pedestrian area that is full of people on foot.

No cars allowed along many city blocks within this area. It’s, um, pretty damn quiet during the peak business hours. The serenity is almost palpable.

I haven’t even begun to think how Amarillo might pull this off. How does the city cordon off, say, Polk Street from 11th Avenue to 5th Avenue, turning it into essentially a pedestrian mall? What kind of storefronts would be developed there? Eateries, craft shops, after-hours watering holes? Where would we allow people to park their vehicles?

Ideas pop into my noggin constantly. They have done so here as my wife and I are enjoying time with friends.

I know what many of you are thinking. How does Amarillo pull something like that off? How do we ask Texans who love their pickups, SUVs and assorted gas-guzzlers to park their vehicles outside this zone?

I must assure you that Germans love heir motor vehicles, too. Trust me when I tell you that traveling along the no-speed-limit autobahn is a unique kind of “thrill.” Yes, it’s an acquired taste to be zipping along at roughly 80 mph only to passed as though we’re standing still by motorcyclists and automobiles going — oh, I don’t know — 110 or 120 mph!

“You get used to it,” my friend Martin told us. I asked about the speed of motor traffic and he thought I was unnerved to the point f wanting off the autobahn. “Do you want me to get off?” he asked. “No, it’s OK,” I said.

Still, the Germans here manage to park their cars and ride the train into this shopping and eating district. They manage to enjoy themselves just fine.

Do we impose a never-drive zone that it’s in effect 24/7?

Do we make it an after-hours zone, say, from 5 p.m. until 2 a.m. daily?

I don’t know. I’m just tossing this one out there for you to consider.

If I’m all wet, full of buffalo bagels, living in a pipe-dream world, well, you are welcome to tell me so.

However, I am not yet willing to toss aside any ideas for what I believe can lead to an even better downtown district for Amarillo, a city I’ve grown to love.

Yes, Donald, ‘people’ care about those tax returns

trump

Donald J. Trump has asserted that “people” don’t care about his tax returns.

I now shall differ with the Republican presidential nominee.

When he says “people,” he refers to the 30 percent or so of the voting public that has bought into his message — whatever it is — that has propelled him to the GOP nomination.

The rest of us? Well, I think others care.

He’s not releasing his tax returns ostensibly because of an Internal Revenue Service audit … according to Trump. The IRS says it’s nonsense, that an audit doesn’t preclude someone from revealing the returns.

He likely won’t release them until after the election, presuming of course he gets elected. If he loses — which is what I believe will happen — we’ll never see them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-wants-you-to-trust-him-blindly/2016/09/06/fa370832-745a-11e6-be4f-3f42f2e5a49e_story.html?postshare=6521473201452988&tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.e2ee1f29ab54

Trump’s tax returns are our business. He might not believe so, but they are.

If someone seeks to become president of the United States, then everything about them becomes part of the public’s concern. That certainly ought to include the way the candidate handles his financial affairs. It provides a window that allows us to understand how he might govern.

If the candidate is going to propose certain tax obligations on the people he or she governs, then we need to know whether that candidate also is paying his or her fair share of taxes. Is that so unreasonable? I think not.

Trump is playing fast and loose with a longstanding political custom dating back 40 years. Presidential candidates have released their tax returns to give Americans a fuller picture of what they’re buying into — or rejecting.

Come clean, Donald Trump.

A pleasant airport/flying story … finally!

8079727-the-metaphor-of-international-air-travel-around-the-world-travel-to-anywhere-on-the-planet-earth-and

We’ve all bemoaned how unpleasant air travel has become since 9/11.

Long lines at security checkpoints; having to virtually undress to get through the scanners; occasionally brusque treatment from Transportation Safety Administration personnel; old folks and babies being whisked away for more intense interrogation.

I’m going to impart to you a pleasant airport tale that, frankly, caught my wife and I by surprise as we traveled to Germany.

We arrived at Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport well in advance of our departure. We checked out luggage at the American Airlines ticket counter. We then proceeded to the security area expecting to be all but frisked and body searched by an overzealous TSA agent.

The fellow who greeted us checked out boarding passes and then handed us each a shiny card and said we could present it to the other agent standing by the body scanner. It would enable us to proceed through an “expedited” scanning process, meaning we didn’t have to take off our shoes and go through all the other normal nonsense.

Zoom! We were through slick as a whistle.

We proceeded to the gate area, where we purchased a hot drink and a bagel. The young woman asked us a bit later if we wanted coffee refills. “Well … yes. That would be nice,” my wife said. So, she gave us a refill and wished us safe travels.

We flew to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport aboard a brand new Embraer jet; a flight attendant told us it was brought online just this past spring. The flight was smoooooth, man!

We then went looking for where to eat at D/FW. We found a sandwich joint. The waitress could not possibly have been nicer, more courteous and efficient. She, too, wished us well as went to our gate.

Then we boarded a Boeing 777-200 jumbo jet for the nine-hour flight to Frankfurt. We departed at precisely the scheduled time and took off.

To top it all off, we arrived at our destination 30 minutes ahead of schedule.

So … there you have it. Traveling by air can be a pleasant experience.

Now, if only I could learn to sleep on an airplane.

Trump has them scratching their heads

Cassidy-Donald-Trump-Americas-Muslims-1200

WEITERSDORF, Germany — It turns out, based on some preliminary conversations with friends, that Germans and Americans are of like minds as it regards the U.S. presidential election.

Hillary Clinton has some baggage.

But it’s light as a feather compared to what Donald J. Trump is lugging around.

Our friends are having trouble understanding — just as many Americans are experiencing — how it is that Trump has managed to score the presidential nomination of a major American political party.

Trump, the Republican nominee, frightens our friend Martin — a journalist who works in Nuremberg. The same can be said of his wife, Alena, who’s also scared at the prospect of a Trump election to the presidency.

Martin asked my wife and me almost immediately upon our arrival to predict the outcome of the presidential election.

“Hillary is going to be elected,” I said, barely drawing a breath.

My friend isn’t so sure. He seems to believe Trump could get elected. I haven’t quite said so out loud, but my own view is that hell would have to freeze over and that the sun would have rise in the west for that to happen.

Martin also wonders whether there is a latent sexist strain among American voters who just do not want a woman to become head of state. “We have Angela Merkel as chancellor,” he said, adding that she’s “universally loathed here,” but said she’s “still the chancellor.” He wonders if Americans are ready to elect a woman.

I said that appears to be a still-largely unspoken element in the U.S. presidential campaign.

Alena echoes her husband’s view regarding Clinton and Trump. She has a bit more hands-on political experience, as she works for a member of the German parliament, helping him write laws and answering constituents’ needs in his office.

I’m going to be visiting during the next few days here with locals, presuming they’re willing to talk to me.

I’ll report to you what I hear from this part of the world about what’s happening back home. Rest assured, as near as I can tell, that Germans seem to be watching with great interest in what’s about to happen in the New World.

Moreover, as Martin said, late-night comics in Germany are having as much fun as our guys are having back home. He mentioned how one of them joked how a President Trump would blast Denmark off the map if the Danes said the wrong thing.

I know, that’s not really a funny thing to consider. Then again …

Perspective, folks … perspective!

conspiracy theory

Social media are full of interesting tidbits, factoids, a bit of propaganda and pithy commentary.

The item I posted here showed up over the weekend on my Facebook news feed. It’s been passed around a good bit.

It comes from someone who obviously supports Hillary Rodham Clinton’s bid to become the next president of the United States.

It calls for “perspective” from those who insist that Clinton is the worst politician in American history ever to vie for presidency.

The private e-mail server issue hasn’t played out fully. My guess is that might never play out sufficiently to suit every single critic who believes she endangered national security while serving as secretary of state; that she put lives at risk by sending out top-secret messages on her personal e-mail server.

Recent history, though, is full of examples of presidents lying to our faces.

* * *

I’ll take issue, though, with one of the items noted in this anonymous post. The purveyor of this item seems to think President Ford’s pardon of President Nixon was an act of evil. It wasn’t.

Richard Nixon was party to a serious constitutional crisis, the one known as “Watergate.” He paid a terrible political price, arriving at the doorstep of impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives before resigning his office on Aug. 9, 1974.

Gerald Ford took over and a month or so later, issued a blanket pardon. His reason? To spare the nation more political agony.

I was furious at the time. So were many Americans. I wanted the former president to pay even more for what he did while at the nation’s helm. The cover-up, how he sicced the feds against his “enemies,” how he ordered the FBI to look the other way in investigating the break-in at the Democratic National Committee office.

Ford’s pardon of Nixon likely cost the president a chance at being elected in 1976.

It turned out, though, to be an act of courage.

Many years later, the John F. Kennedy Library in Boston bestowed its “Profile in Courage” award to President Ford for that decision. The late Sen. Ted Kennedy, speaking on behalf of his family, acknowledged in public remarks that he, too, was wrong to criticize the president for making that decision, but that he came to realize he did the right thing.

The rest of the items noted in the brief missive attached to this blog post? Yep. I agree with ’em.

Time for some perspective, folks.

Public safety: it’s important at many levels

13578011

“SHALL the City Council of the City of Amarillo, Texas, be authorized to issue general obligation bonds of the City in the principal amount of $20,080,000 for permanent public improvements and public purposes, to wit:  acquiring, constructing, improving, renovating, expanding and equipping public safety facilities; such bonds to mature serially or otherwise over a period not to exceed twenty-five (25) years from their date, to be issued and sold in one or more series at any price or prices and to bear interest at any rate or rates (fixed, floating, variable or otherwise) as shall be determined within the discretion of the City Council at the time of issuance or sale of the bonds; and whether ad valorem taxes shall be levied upon all taxable property in the City sufficient to pay the annual interest and provide a sinking fund to pay the bonds at maturity?”

Proposition 2 on the Nov. 8 Amarillo municipal election ballot

I don’t know this to be a stone-cold fact, but it’s probably true.

Ask any resident of any city of significant size about the issue that concerns them the most, they well might answer it has something to do with police and fire protection.

If the city is going to provide top-flight law enforcement and fire protection services, then it falls on the residents who demand it to pay for it.

Makes sense, yes?

Sure it does!

Proposition 2 proposes to spend $20 million on improvements to police and fire services.

It seeks to add new fire stations, replacing current stations that no longer are functional. It seeks to spend nearly $500,000 on assorted “police service improvements.”

This proposition likely will get voters’ endorsement when they go to the polls on Nov. 8. The city has pitched seven ballot measures at residents, asking them to support them all at a cost of more than $340 million. The public safety element is but a fraction of the total cost.

However, public safety always remains at the top of voters’ concerns about the level of government they get from City Hall.

http://amarillo.gov/pdf/CIP_list_for_ballot_resolution.pdf

My hope is that this proposition gets the voters’ wholehearted approval in November.

If we are going to insist on top-of-the-line public safety services, we have to be ready to pay for it.

Trump now must decide: Do I show up to debate Hillary?

AAiuBxc

I cannot believe some media outlets are actually asking this question seriously.

Is Donald Trump going to agree to debate Hillary Rodham Clinton now that we know who will moderate these three events, or will he back out?

Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, has agreed to face Republican nominee Trump who, apparently, hasn’t yet agreed formally to show for any or all of them.

It seems that he wanted to see who the networks would select as moderators. Now he knows.

NBC’s Lester Holt will moderate the first one; ABC’s Martha Raddatz and CNN’s Anderson Cooper get the second one; Fox News’s Chris Wallace gets the third one.

All are capable journalists. All are tough-minded.

And all of them, apparently, have had some “issues” with Trump.

Thus, we get the question about whether the GOP nominee will show up.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-wanted-to-%E2%80%98see-who-the-moderators-are%E2%80%99-now-that-he-has-will-he-debate/ar-AAiu2ho?li=BBmkt5R

The tempest over his feud with Fox’s Megyn Kelly is going down already as a serious back story of this amazingly unpredictable campaign. Trump didn’t show up for a debate when he learned Kelly would be one of the co-moderators. His absence obviously didn’t harm his nomination chances.

Trump has bitched about moderators before. All of the journalists named as moderators have questioned Trump hard on some of the answers he has given. Will his notoriously thin skin prevent him from being questioned yet again?

He’s also griped that the debates were scheduled opposite televised NFL games, which he said would drive down viewership of the debate — which, quite naturally, he alleges is a conspiracy to get Clinton elected.

The only thing I can surmise if Trump were actually to refuse to show up for any of these three joint appearances is that some of the conspiracy theorists are right about one thing: Trump is throwing this election because he truly doesn’t want to be elected president of the United States.

Who is God? Just ask Trump

85799425_gop2016trump_logi-1

David Brody of the Christian Broadcasting Network asked Donald J. Trump a perfectly sensible question.

“Who is God?” Brody asked.

The Republican presidential nominee then launched into something that was unrecognizable as a legitimate answer to a simple, but serious, question about spirituality.

https://twitter.com/LPDonovan/status/772275637444902915/video/1

Trump talked about the “deal” he negotiated to purchase a big slice of coastal property. He talked about how he has “no mortgage” on the property.

Then the video concludes with Trump saying that God is “the ultimate” and that there’s “nothing like God.”

That’s pretty deep, huh?

And this is the candidate who’s drawing all that evangelical support?

Go figure, man.