Is there any better example of being “damned if you do, or don’t” than President Obama’s appointment of an Ebola “czar”?
Let’s meet Ronald Klain, who is the new manager of the government’s response to the Ebola situation. Klain is a trusted adviser to the president, a Mr. Fix-It sort of individual. He is known as a master government technician who knows how to make things work.
http://news.yahoo.com/video/obama-names-ebola-point-person-211624626.html
He’s not a medical professional. However, he comes into the game reportedly with a good deal of nuts-and-bolts know-how.
Republicans in Congress have been yapping about the president’s propensity for naming these “czars.” He’s got a czar for all kinds of things.
Yet … the GOP wanted him to name an Ebola czar because, they contend, the government’s response to this so-called “crisis” has been tepid, ineffective, milquetoast.
So then Obama puts Klain on the job.
GOP leaders now contend that Klain is the wrong person for the job. I haven’t yet heard who they think is the right person, or even how they would describe that individual.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/17/politics/ebola-czar-gop-reaction/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
I’m not at all certain the president even needed to appoint a czar to do this job.
A surgeon general would have been an appropriate person to lead the nation’s response to this matter, but Republicans have blocked the naming of that individual for reasons that have nothing to do with his or her medical qualifications. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is run by someone who’s qualified to coordinate the effort; but Dr. Thomas Frieden has been criticized — again, by Republicans mostly — his own agency’s failure to manage this “crisis.”
The president is damned yet again for doing what his critics have demanded he do.
a little partisan, are we?
No more than the other guys, perhaps.
Then there are the folks who see a thing critically for what it is, on various levels. My hope is that more and more wealthy, educated, and intelligent folks disassociate entirely with politics, power, policy, special interests, personal interests,and social constructs begin to to criticalyl think, freshly and unbiasedly, moment to moment, unshackling themselves from the burden of the past, both historically and in the most recent moment just after the immediate present. We burden ourselves and our minds with labels, defining ourselves by defining the “other guy,” -psst…there is no other guy – and through contrived attachments.
mistype – ..critically..