Tag Archives: Ohio primary

Good news, bad news in GOP primary fight

untitled

The good news for me tonight occurred in Ohio, where my favorite Republican presidential candidate, Gov. John Kasich, scored a home-state victory in the GOP primary.

The bad news is that my second-favorite Republican candidate, Sen. Marco Rubio, dropped out of the race because he couldn’t win his home state of Florida.

I’m sad to suggest that the bad news outweighs the good news.

Why? Because I don’t know where Kasich goes from here.

He doesn’t appear ready to win more state primaries as the field of three GOP contenders marches on down the primary trail. Sure, he’s going to proclaim a huge victory tonight.

Donald J. Trump, though, won most of the rest of the state battles. His delegate lead has grown a bit over the other scary GOP candidate, Texas U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz.

At least, though, the remaining grown-up, the guy with an actual record of accomplishment in government, the fellow who speaks of compassion and constructive outlooks, the guy who said business owners should “pray” for customers with whom they might have spiritual difference is still in the race.

If only I could look a lot farther down the GOP campaign road to see him staying in the hunt for the presidency.

I can’t.

As for Rubio, well, he had emerged as my clear second pick among the Republicans. Yes, despite his childish counterattack against Trump in that debate, I believe young Marco — hey, he’s about the age of my older son, so I feel free to refer to him by his first name — came back strong in the Miami event with Trump, Cruz and Kasich.

It was for naught. He got smoked tonight in his home state by a charlatan masquerading as a serious candidate for the nation’s most glorious office.

So now we’re down to three candidates for the Republican presidential nomination. As I see it, we’ve got one adult left in the hunt competing against a know-nothing narcissist (Trump) and a fire-breathing demagogue (Cruz).

If only the adult had a chance to compete in this crazy, wacked-out GOP primary campaign season.

 

Marco about to exit … too bad

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at National Harbor, Maryland March 14, 2013. Two senators seen as possible candidates for the 2016 presidential election will address a conservative conference where Republicans will try to regroup on Thursday after their bruising election loss last year.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque  (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS) - RTR3EZQO

It’s not looking good for my second-favorite Republican still running for president of the United States.

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida appears to be trailing badly in his home state, which on Tuesday votes along with four other states in this on-going GOP primary campaign.

Dammit anyway!

I thought Rubio acquitted himself quite well on one key issue at the recent GOP primary debate in Miami: Islam’s alleged “hatred for America.”

He challenge Republican frontrunner Donald J. Trump’s ridiculous assertion that Islam’s religious doctrine hates this country. That is patently ridiculous on its face, not that it matters to the Trumpsters who keep scarfing up his nonsense like some sort of political energy food.

Rubio took exception to Trump’s pronouncement by reminding him of the presence of gravestones at our national cemeteries where our fallen soldiers are buried. He told of how many of those stones have Islamic crescents carved into them to signify the religious affiliation of the warrior buried there.

These men and women love our country as much as anyone, Rubio said. They do not hate America simply because they practice a certain religious faith, he scolded Trump.

Rubio also made sure to point out that none of the men on that debate stage ever had worn a military uniform; not even Trump, who has sought to equate his enrollment at a military high school with actual service in the military.

Rubio scored points with me that evening when he correctly sought to discredit that ridiculous and patently false Trump statement.

It likely won’t help him in his home state. I saw a poll this morning that suggests that Trump has virtually doubled Rubio’s standing in Florida. If the young senator can’t win there, well, he cannot hope to win anywhere else.

Hey, there’s still Ohio to be decided Tuesday, where my favorite Republican — Gov. John Kasich — is hoping for a home-state victory to slam the brakes on Trump’s momentum.

 

Legislating from the bench? Maybe so

young-voters-hit-the-polls-in-2012

I’m usually not one to comment on judges being accused of becoming black-robed “legislators.” Must be my liberal bias.

An Ohio judge, though, just might fit the bill of a jurist who has taken a step or two too far.

Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge Richard Frye has ruled that Ohio voters who are 17 years of age today can vote in the Tuesday primary if they’ll be of legal voting age — that’s 18 years of age — by November.

My first reaction is: huh?

It makes no sense.

Let me see if this adds up. Someone who’s not yet old enough to vote will be able to vote in the primary anyway. On what grounds does this make sense?

Frye’s ruling is seen as a potentially big win for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, one of two Democrats running for president. Sanders has been getting a lot of young voters’ support and this could open up a large trove of votes; I guess pledges of free college tuition are resonating with the young voters.

“This is a huge victory for 17-year-olds across Ohio. Their votes for presidential nominees will now count when they vote on either Tuesday or over the weekend in early voting,” Sanders campaign counsel Brad Deutch said in a statement.

But, but … how does that compute? How does someone get to vote prior to being of legal voting age?

Ohio’s Republican secretary of state, Jon Husted, is incensed over the ruling. He vows to appeal it. I think he’s got a case for judicial overreach.

I’m a simple fellow. It just seems to me that pre-dating someone’s voting eligibility smacks of manipulation that the law shouldn’t allow.

To be honest, this kind of reminds me of something I witnessed in Jefferson County, Texas, many years when two judges whose courts had criminal jurisdiction were slapped hard by the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct for back-dating prison sentences. The judges would sentence defendants to prison terms that began before the crimes actually took place. The state’s court watchdog organization took a dim view of it.

Judge Frye, by my way of thinking, is playing a similar game by giving Ohio teens the right to vote before they are actually legally entitled to do so.