Tag Archives: Congress

Uncategorized

Congressman is gone; don’t end investigation

Trey Radel has bid adieu to the House of Representatives, which means — more than likely — the end of an ethics investigation into the act that got him into trouble.

The probe should go forward.

Radel resignation likely ends ethics investigation

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group, has called for the continuation of the investigation by the House ethics committee.

To what end? How about sending a message to lawmakers who mess up that the threat of an investigation isn’t just for political purposes, to pressure them to leave office.

Radel pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of cocaine possession when he tried to buy the drug from an undercover narcotics cop in Washington, D.C. He went into rehab, came out and then today announced his resignation from Congress, after serving for less than a full term.

He’s not the first lawmaker to leave under a cloud. Democratic Reps. David Wu of Oregon, Jesse Jackson Jr. of Illinois and Republican Rep. Nathan Deal of Georgia all left Congress while under investigation. Once they blew the joint, the probes ended. Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., also was being investigated. He quit the Senate and the Senate ethics panel released its report a month later.

CREW thinks there’s more behind Radel’s resignation and wants questions answered. The group wants to know, for example, who introduced Radel to his drug dealer? Did Radel share his cocaine with anyone?

Ethics investigations shouldn’t be about politics. They should seek answers to why lawmakers flout the law, the rules of ethical conduct and should make strong recommendations that the entire Congress should adopt.

Sadly, this often isn’t the case. Trey Radel is but the latest example of an ethics probe that gets derailed because committee members seemingly don’t want to bother with examining the conduct of someone who’s no longer serving.

It should matter to them. They, too, serve the public — and the public deserves a Congress that behaves ethically.

Uncategorized

Congressman needed to go

Trey Radel deserves a pat on the back today for doing the right thing.

The Florida Republican congressman is going to announce his resignation from the House of Representatives after he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor cocaine possession charge.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/01/27/trey_radel_to_resign_house_seat_121366.html

If only other allegedly high-minded public servants would be so noble.

Radel had to go. The state’s Republican establishment had deserted him. Others were lining up to run for his safely Republican seat, including the guy he succeeded in the House, former Rep. Connie Mack.

Why is this an important resignation? Because some Americans — me included — want our elected representatives to represent the best in us. Radel got caught possessing cocaine, a serious drug that has been known to kill those who use it. He sits in a body that makes laws to punish people severely for using this illegal substance. Therefore, Trey Radel no longer could in good conscience continue to serve in that body.

I don’t subscribe to the idea that we should elect saints to public office. Those who take an oath to honor and defend the Constitution, though, should have clean hands.

Radel’s hands got very dirty.

Other members of Congress haven’t been so noble. They’ve hung on to their seats while they fight criminal charges. Others manage to embarrass their constituents, not to mention their families with their roguish, boorish and occasionally illegal behavior.

I’ll give Rep. Radel praise for doing what he had to do by stepping away from the public arena.

Uncategorized

‘Compromise’ not such a dirty word

It turns out that compromise indeed is possible in the 113th Congress.

When it shows itself, we learn that things actually can get done, such as approving a federal budget that keeps the government running through September. The House of Representatives approved the deal overwhelmingly and has sent it back to the Senate hopefully for final approval.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/15/politics/house-spending-bill/index.html

The $1.1 trillion budget deal marks a departure from recent history, where Republicans and Democrats have fought over every big and little thing in the budget. It has produced gridlock, made a lot of people angry, shut down part of the government for a time, forced public opinion of Congress into a sinkhole and redefined the term “political dysfunction.”

Does this signal a new day on Capitol Hill? Probably not. However, one can hope.

Tomorrow might bring a new set of hassles and disagreements, particularly in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives that seems to have declared its intention to block everything House Democrats and the Democrat in chief in the White House want to do.

The bill reduces funds for the Internal Revenue Service, gives federal workers a 1 percent pay increase and gives money to the Environmental Protection Agency. These measures make Republicans happy. Meanwhile, Democrats got something for themselves, such as funding for Head Start, which helps early childhood education efforts.

No one is entirely happy with the deal, nor are they entirely unhappy.

That’s the spirit of compromise. Things can get done. It’s how you legislate. It’s how good government is supposed to work.

What’s more, it doesn’t inflict nearly the pain that stubborn intransigence can produce.

Uncategorized

Bipartisanship clawing its way back? Maybe

The U.S. House of Representatives, led by the Republicans — who are in turn being rattled by the tea party wing of their own party — is beginning to rumble with bipartisanship once again.

Perhaps.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/12/12/house_passes_budget_bill.html

The House voted 332-94 in favor of the two-year budget deal hammered out by a conference committee co-chaired by Republican House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray.

Is the deal perfect? Hardly.

But it prevents another partial government shutdown, which turned out to be a nightmare for Republicans in October — when the latest shutdown occurred.

The usual right-wing crazies are calling the deal a loser. They gripe about it not cutting enough money from government spending. They want to keep the mandated budget cuts called “sequestration,” which the committee managed to toss aside.

Some lefties also are unhappy, about the failure to provide long-term unemployment insurance for about a million jobless Americans. I happen to agree with their unhappiness — therefore, I won’t call myself “crazy,” if you get my drift.

The House vote, though, did attract a lot of GOP support, which produced the overwhelming victory for common sense and compromise … which ought to be the hallmark of legislating.

I still fear the tea party cabal in the House is going to find a way to torpedo further attempts to make government work. For now, it’s been pushed aside. I’m happy about that.

Uncategorized

Yep, another federal budget deadline looms

Happy Monday, everyone. Welcome to the latest Week When All Hell Might Break Loose.

Here’s the good news: The work week ends on Friday the 13th, which is the day U.S. House and Senate budget negotiators are supposed to produce a budget deal that forestalls another government shutdown.

Any takers on whether they get it done?

Well, here we are yet again. We’ve been through one of these government shutdowns already. It lasted 16 days and Republicans took the big hickey on that deal. The “crisis” ended when all the parties agreed to convene a conference committee chaired by two serious lawmakers — Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Republican Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin — to hammer out a new budget deal.

The stakes are big. Absent a budget deal, the government could shut down once more. We hear now about a major sticking point: whether to extend unemployment insurance for long-term jobless Americans. President Obama wants to extend the benefit; his “friends” on the Republican side in Congress, naturally, oppose it.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20131207/DAAHG0F83.html

House Speaker John Boehner is actually making sense, suggesting Republicans could support an extension.

My guess is that the GOP has another — more pragmatic — reason to avoid a shutdown. It involves the Affordable Care Act.

You see, Democrats have lost their political edge over the ACA rollout. All that advantage they had over Republicans because of the shutdown dissipated when the ACA debut crashed and burned because of that faulty website. It gave Republicans loads of fresh meat to gnaw on. They’re still chewing on it and inflicting as much damage as possible on Democrats.

Do Republicans want to surrender that advantage? I don’t think so.

Therefore, I’m almost ready to suggest that the Murray- and Ryan-led committee just might cobble together a budget deal that heads off a government shutdown.

Uncategorized

Sequestration bad for education

Texas’ congressional delegation has been scolded by a gang of top-level Texas higher education officials — representing private and public schools across the state.

Our congressmen and women need to get their knuckles rapped.

http://www.texastribune.org/2013/12/03/texas-higher-ed-leaders-share-sequestration-concer/

Sequestration has educators concerned. They fear the mandatory budget cuts enacted by Congress and signed by President Obama will bring potentially irreparable damage to the state’s higher education network.

“Further reductions to the budgets of research agencies and other federal programs threaten critical national investments that grow our state’s economy, support Texas students, and spur the innovation and discovery required to meet future scientific, medical and economic needs,” the group wrote.

The full roster of signatures, by the way, does not include Texas Tech University Chancellor Kent Hance — a former member of Congress. The list, though, does include Texas Tech President Duane Nellis, who presumably had Hance’s blessing before putting his name on the letter.

I hope the letter and the concerns it expresses about higher education and research doesn’t fall on deaf ears in Washington. Listen up, Rep. Mac Thornberry; they’re talking to you, too.

However, as is too often the case, lawmakers from both parties listen a bit too intently to the fringe base elements within their party and fail to heed warnings from the unwashed masses out here in the heartland.

Sequestration, let’s remember, involve the mandatory budget cuts that kicked in at the beginning of the year. They were supposed to be last-resort measure that was enacted because lawmakers and the president didn’t believe Congress would allow the sequestration to occur. Silly them. They did allow it.

According to the Texas Tribune, “the group warned that sequestration cuts will stifle innovation, resulting in a reduction in gross domestic product, and that students — more than 850,000 are enrolled at Texas universities — will also suffer.”

Our elected leaders keep talking about ensuring a brighter future for their states and the nation. Is this the way to do it, by cutting the guts out of higher education? I think not.

Uncategorized

Iran must pay huge price for non-compliance

Congress is going to step into the Iranian nuclear program dismantling discussion if the need arises.

Go for it, lawmakers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-eastnorth-africa/191416-congress-prepares-to-punish-tehran

The deal hammered out over the weekend between several of the great powers and Iran calls for the mullahs to take down its nuclear program over time. They must not develop a nuclear weapon. In return Iran will see a partial lifting of economic sanctions that have punished that country’s economy — and which, in my view, have helped bring the Iranians to the negotiating table after years of refusing to discuss their nuclear development program.

Iran has six months to make good on its promises. If it doesn’t, or if it reneges on any element of the agreement, then Congress is going to take action to clamp down even tighter on the Islamic Republic.

The decision to take action if Iran doesn’t comply forestalls any effort to derail the agreement brokered by Secretary of State John Kerry and the Iranian foreign minister. Yes, the agreement has drawn heavy fire from congressional Republicans and Democrats, not to mention from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who calls the agreement a “historic mistake.”

Israel remains prepared to take unilateral military action against Iran if it feels threatened. Who can blame the Israelis, given the constant battles they fight with many of their neighbors who are intent on destroying Israel?

The agreement might not be perfect, but Iran has paid a heavy price already for its refusal to talk — until now — with the rest of the world about its nuclear intentions. As for Israel’s security, Kerry says our nation’s key Middle East ally will remain secure and that the United States will continue to stand foursquare behind it.

Meanwhile, Congress is right to prepare a punishment option to have ready in the event Iran doesn’t comply with the agreement.

The task now is to persuade the Iranians that additional suffering makes it necessary for them to follow through.

Uncategorized

Congressional polls keep plummeting

I keep track of polls on occasion, the favorite of which is the RealClearPolitics.com average of polls.

It keeps arguably the most accurate account of polling activity for one reason: It averages all the polls together, the left-wing polls, the right-wing polls, the neutral polls — all of them. It then calculates the average of all the surveys taken together.

The latest RCP poll average on Congress’s approval with Americans is worth noting.

It puts the approval rating at 9.2 percent.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html

It was at 9.6 percent just two days ago. A week before that it was at 10 percent.

Many individual polls suggest that Americans are so angry with Congress’s handling of the budget and debt ceiling kerfuffle that they might return the House of Representatives to Democratic control in next year’s midterm elections.

The thought is putting stars in the eyes of congressional Democrats, namely Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, who could get the gavel back in January 2015 as speaker of the House.

The Republican House majority is neither narrow or huge. Democrats have to capture 17 seats from the Republicans to win back control. That’s 17 out of 435 total seats. It’s not many. Were that to occur, President Obama could get his legislative agenda unstuck in a hurry. Issues such as immigration reform might actually get passed. Americans also finally might be able to have a budget passed in a timely fashion, without the hysterics and histrionics we’ve seen of late.

The strangest aspect, in my mind, of the fallout from the debt ceiling and government shutdown debacles is that many hardline Republicans aren’t getting the message. They’re vowing to continue fighting the battle — to defund the Affordable Care Act — that they just lost.

I’m sensing that stubbornness lies at the heart of Americans’ disapproval of Congress in general — and in Republicans in particular.

The next year is shaping up as a rough ride for the GOP.

Uncategorized

Even ‘our SOBs’ may need to get tossed

I’ve been thinking the past few days about my former congressman, the late Jack Brooks, a crusty Democrat who served Southeast Texas for more than four decades before getting beat in that landmark 1994 Republican sweep of Congress.

Jack used to refer to himself as Sweet Old Brooks, which translates into the initials SOB. He was proud of his irascible nature. In fact, Brooks embodied the saying of members of Congress that so-and-so “may be an SOB, but he’s our SOB.”

Some polling has come out in recent days that suggests American voters may be more likely than at any time in memory to throw out their congressman or woman in the next election, largely because of the trumped-up drama that took us once more to the brink of defaulting on our financial obligations.

The faux drama ended late Wednesday when the Senate leadership cobbled together a deal to reopen part of the federal government and lift the debt ceiling so we can pay our bills.

The consequences of defaulting are quite chilling to consider. The financial markets would have collapsed, taking millions of Americans’ retirement accounts into the crapper.

Still, with that prospect hanging over Americans’ heads, a number of senators and House members voted against the deal to prevent the default. Who voted no? Among them were Texas’s two GOP senators, John Cornyn and Ted Cruz and my current Republican member of Congress, Mac Thornberry.

Thornberry said on TV tonight that he voted “no” because the deal didn’t solve any problems; it only postponed for a few months a situation that he thinks will repeat itself when the debt ceiling is set to expire once more.

I guess my question for the dissenters is this: How would you propose to solve all those problems at the last minute?

I’ll concede that the political system is badly broken. However, Thornberry, Cornyn and Cruz all are part of what ails it. They, of course, blame the other party — just as the other party blames them.

So, to fix the problem they proposed letting the government default on its debts, allowing the economy to crash, keeping federal employees furloughed and maintaining maximum dysfunction in our federal government. Reminds me of the old Vietnam War axiom of “destroying the village in order to save it.”

To think that some folks still wonder why Congress’s approval rating is in the sewer.

Uncategorized

Debt deal is no ‘victory’ for anyone

President Obama has called the debt deal brokered by the U.S. Senate that reopens the federal government and saves the nation from defaulting on its debts as some kind of victory.

It isn’t.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/328985-obama-hails-debt-deals-passage-as-lifting-cloud-of-unease

It delays the next fight, which is going to occur early in 2014 when the federal government will come up against the next debt ceiling deadline and when the government runs out of money to keep many “non-essential” agencies running.

Sens. Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid struck a deal early Wednesday. The Senate approved it; then the House of Representatives followed suit.

The whole scene produced a disgraceful display of brinkmanship, showmanship, posturing, demagoguery and cheap politicization. In my view, the bad guys continue to be the tea party wing of the House Republican caucus, which fought almost to the very end to defund the Affordable Care Act and pursued that tactic as a method of getting their way.

What now? Well, members of Congress are supposed to begin meeting to hammer out a “permanent” budget solution. Good luck with that. Count me as one American who has no faith — zero, none — that Congress will negotiate any kind of long-term agreement that will prevent this kind of nonsense from recurring in the near future.