Let’s try to end this nonsensical discussion about whether the DREAM Act has played a role in the crisis on our southern border.
It hasn’t a thing to do with it.
The DREAM Act — which stands for Development, Relief, Education for Alien Minors — is intended to give a break those who were brought here illegally by their parents when they were children. It’s meant to clear a path toward citizenship if these individuals meet certain requirements.
The principle — supported by none other than Texas Gov. Rick Perry, among others — is to give those who have known only life in the United States to become citizens. It’s akin to Perry’s support of providing in-state public university tuition to these young Texans.
Some critics of President Obama have sought to suggest that the DREAM Act is a code for “amnesty” for the children who are flocking to this country from Central America. The actual attraction comes from a 2008 law signed by President Bush after it was approved unanimously by Congress. The law is intended to strike back against child pornographers and other human traffickers by making it more difficult to deport those who are here illegally.
With the border being choked with young refugees from Latin America, some now want to tweak that 2008 law to speed up the deportation process.
The hysterical criticism that gets tossed around, however, needs to be reeled in.
The border crisis really isn’t a function of a “porous border.” It’s a lengthy border along our southern flank, to be sure. However, to suggest that the U.S. Border Patrol isn’t doing its job requires one to examine all the children who have been taken into custody.
They are being held in detention centers. The system has been choked by the sheer volume of refugees who have fled here. It needs serious repair.
How about we deal with the real problem and stop casting blame in search of scapegoats?
The DREAM Act isn’t the problem.