My wife and I — along with our dog Toby — have just returned from a week on the road.
Our travels took us south, then west, then north andĀ back home. Along the way we zoomed through three substantial cities: Tucson and Phoenix, Ariz., and Albuquerque.
Tucson and Albuquerque are about the same size, roughly 550,000 or so residents; Phoenix is home to more than 1.5 million folks.
What do they have in common, other than fairly picturesque landscapes?
They all have highways that are attractive to the eye. Moreover, they are attractive to those of us who are just passing through. They leave us with a smattering of good vibes about the city and the care the leaders there take in dressing up their highways.
Whenever we see such things on our travels around the country, the same question keeps popping back into my pointed head: Why can’t Amarillo dress up its lone major freeway interchange?
One of these days — maybe soon — I intend to get to the bottom of this dilemma.
TheĀ Texas Department of Transportation rebuilt the Interstate 40/27 interchange just a few years ago. It reversed the over-under ramps of both highways. It built new structures and then painted the concrete in Palo Duro Canyon colors, with green trim. ItĀ painted those Amarillo Chamber of Commerce boots on the side of the overpasses.
Then it decided to plant a few native trees.
That’s it.
TxDOT hasn’t done much to spruce up the appearance of the interchange. I visited once some years ago with the TxDOT officials who oversaw the landscaping of the interchange and he told me — in response to a question about the then-shabby appearance of the interchange — that the state was allowing “native flora” to take over. My reaction was, well, laughter.
The state can do much better than it has done with this highway “beautification” effort.
If other cities and states can make their public rights-of-way attractive to visitors passing through, why not Amarillo?