Barack Obama could have invoked the late, great Winston Churchill at his press conference today.
Churchill once said it is better to “jaw, jaw, jaw than to war, war, war.”
So it is with President Obama’s defense of the deal struck with Iran that seeks to end Iran’s quest to acquire nuclear weapons.
I remain more or less undecided on the merits of the deal, but the president has posed a fascinating challenge to his critics.
Is it better to take military action to remove Iran’s nuclear capability, or is it better to use diplomacy to rid them of their nuclear ambitions?
Critics, Obama said, haven’t offered a credible alternative to the deal that struck by Secretary of State John Kerry and his team of international partners. They blast the 159-page deal with words like “appeasement,” “disaster,” and “historic mistake.”
So, what do they suggest? Do we send in squadrons of fighter-bombers to blast the nuclear plants into oblivion? Let the Israelis do it? Do we risk all-out war?
The great Winston Churchill had it right: It’s better to talk than to drop bombs.