The presidential election has been decided … to the satisfaction of a minority of Americans who voted for the winner.
I won’t get into the ongoing discussion about the Electoral College.
Instead, let’s take a brief look at our own next election cycle, right here in Amarillo.
We’re going to elect our City Council next May. Our city charter puts all five seats up for election at the same time. We get to keep ’em all, toss ’em all out or decide on some variation in between.
The May 2015 election produced a pretty radical shakeup on the council. Voters elected three new guys: Randy Burkett, Mark Nair and Elisha Demerson. Voters re-elected two others, Mayor Paul Harpole and Brian Eades; then Eades quit and moved to Colorado and he’s been succeeded by Lisa Blake, who emerged as the frontrunner after a highly public interview process with four other finalists selected by the council.
To say we’ve had a rough time of it at City Hall since the May 2015 election would be the height (or depth) of understatement.
City Manager Jarrett Atkinson quit, along with a number of other senior city administrators. Then the council hired Terry Childers as the interim city manager. That didn’t turn out too well, as Childers this past week quit his job one year to the day after being named the interim manager.
Childers messed up one time too many.
Now the council has to get busy and find someone who wants to take hold of the city’s administrative reins. This is the only hire the council makes directly. It whiffed with Childers. Are these folks capable of filling this critical job? We shall see.
The council has gotten involved in some disputes among its members. The mayor has been at odds openly with the three new fellows, and they have been with him. All this has occurred as the city has embarked on a major makeover of its downtown district. Holy cow, dudes!
So, the question of the moment is this: Will the three new council members face a serious challenge from someone — or from an organized group of residents — if and/or when they seek re-election?
They all promised “change” when they were elected to the council. They certainly have delivered on their promise. Collegiality has given way to chaos. Decorum has been replaced by dysfunction.
The issue that awaits voters, though, is whether the change has been worth the tumult that has boiled over at City Hall.
We’ll find out in due time.