I got scolded the other day for a blog I posted commenting on the drone strike that killed Taliban leader Mullah Mansour.
The fellow who scolded me said the U.S. air strike against the terrorist leader gives cause to continue the fighting.
Someone has to stop it, the individual seemed to imply. Thus, the implied question was: Why not us?
Many of those who read High Plains Blogger — and I am grateful beyond measure for those who do — likely think of me as a squishy liberal, a softy who wants to talk everything through.
When it comes to our war against international terror, I take a back seat to no one in the continuing prosecution of that effort. No, I don’t want us to send combat troops back onto the battlefield. I fully support the air strikes we’ve been launching against the Islamic State, al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
My critic wondered whether we were engaging in an “eye-for-an-eye” type of response.
My view simply is this: The terrorists are targeting innocent victims, mostly fellow Muslims; we are killing the killers.
I see zero compatibility between what the terrorists are doing and what we are doing in response.
Keep the aircraft armed and on the hunt for the bad guys. We’ve got a lot more of them to kill.
