Question for David Plouffe, the former campaign guru for President Obama: What in the world did they teach you in political science classes at the University of Delaware?
Plouffe was a panelist this past Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” news-talk show.
He declared that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s is virtually assured to be the next president of the United States.
Plouffe said Clinton is the “strongest non-incumbent candidate in U.S. political history.”
When I heard him say it, two words came immediately to mind: Dwight Eisenhower.
Let’s flash back to 1952.
General of the Army Eisenhower was just seven years removed from his key role in defeating Nazi Germany and bringing an end to World War II’s fighting in Europe. He came home to huge parades.
Ike then went on to become president of Columbia University and later took over as supreme commander of NATO forces in Europe.
President Truman did not run for re-election in 1952, leaving the field wide open.
Gen. Eisenhower stepped up.
The Republican from Denison, Texas was virtually pre-ordained to become president that year. He defeated Adlai Stevenson in a massive Electoral College landslide, winning 442 electoral votes to Stevenson’s 89. Ike would repeat the drubbing four years later when he ran for re-election.
It’s fair to ask whether Plouffe is fully aware of Dwight Eisenhower’s standing among Americans those 62 years ago.
Hillary Clinton figures to be a strong candidate for president if she decides to run.
Is she the strongest non-incumbent in American political history?
I do not believe that’s the case.