Police officers are taking a beating these days.
Not by everyone, mind you, but by some who at times seem to imply that they believeĀ police officers generally are a trigger-happy bunch too willing to pull their guns out and shoot someone.
I feel compelled to revisit a course I once took courtesy of the Amarillo Police Department.
A few years ago, APD officials invited some media folks toĀ its simulated training center for a little practical training on how and when to fire a pistol at someone committing a crime.
Do you shoot or not shoot? That was the question we had to answer to ourselves in a split second while undergoing a simulated criminal act. In the dark. With little warning of what was about to happen.
We were armed with guns that shot paint balls. If you got hit with one of these pellets, well, it smarted some.
We were dressed with some protective gear, given the scenario we were about to visit, then turned loose into a room, or a hallway to confront someone — portrayed by an Amarillo police officer — who is committing a simulated “crime.”
Shoot or don’t shoot?
I have to admit something right here: I didn’t do well on all the scenarios with which I was presented. In once instance, I “shot” someone who was running away from me. I wasn’t supposed to shoot in that case. The training officers all laughed out loud at me; I laughed back … with considerable embarrassment.
One of the things I learned from the training exercise, though, was how one’s adrenalin rushes through one’s body. My own body was trembling with anticipation as I enteredĀ each scenario — and I knew I was shooting paint balls, not real bullets.
When it was over, I tried to imagine how my adrenal glands would have reacted had I been an on-duty cop, packing a 9-mm pistol, confronting a bad guy and then having to decide in a split second whether to shoot him or let him go.
My sweat-soaked body betrayed the nerves that got the better of me.
Law enforcement does have bad police officers who make poor decisions. They usually are called out by witnesses, the media and even at times fellow officers. The rest of them — most of them — do their jobs well.
Those are the men and women who deserve our thanks.
I agree that most officers are decent hard working folks trying to do the right thing. I also think there are officers who shouldn’t be allowed to carry bubblegum much less a badge and a firearm.
The problem isn’t the individual officers in my mind but the mind set and institutionalization of some philosophies pushed by departments. Too often we see officers demanding instant obedience to any and every command. While there is a time and a place for instant obedience; is it really necessary when pulling over some senior citizen for a traffic violation?
Or when some kid is walking down the street, is in a park carrying a toy?
If I was carrying a toy — even if it looked like a real firearm — I might hesitate for a few seconds if an officer started yelling at me to ‘Drop the weapon’. It isn’t that normal but the police response in those situations has been instant compliance or death.
And then there is the tendency for departments as a whole to try to enforce compliance in contradiction to the law — such as when a citizen pulls out a camera and records an incident from across the street?
While I think many ‘cop block’ advocates are complete and total jerks, it isn’t against the law, they normally don’t interfere with police doing their job, etc. So why do so many departments try to stop legal activities?
Then there is the adoption of military tactics and weapons for non-high threat situations; do we really need SWAT serving warrants on simple possession charges or for someone who didn’t pay an IRS bill?
It isn’t the individual officers that are the problem, it is the mindset of the leadership.
Bob S.