Allow me this admission: I am all in on Donald Trump’s desire to make government more “efficient” and more “accountable” to the folks who pay for it … that means you and me.
We have heard tales for decades about wasteful spending in our federal government. Remember the stories about $600 toilet seats? Or airplanes that couildn’t fly?
Those were maddening tales to be sure. Trump got elected in 2024 partly on his promise to cut waste in our government. Hey, count me in!
What I — nor I doubt any other American — could foresee was the method Trump would use to slash government spending. Indiscrimiinate firings of inspectors general, or civil servants, of dedicated public employees, slashing of entire Cabinet departments all have become part of the modus operandi.
Then we have Elon Musk and that quasi-government agency called the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The term DOGE has become part of the government vernacular like NASA. We refer to the acronym as if it’s a real word.
Musk has been unbridled in his public statements about cutting Social Security, which has called a Ponzi scheme when, in fact, it is an earned benefit paid for with our tax noney we old folks paid with our tax money. That doesn’t matter to the richest man on Earth, whose DOGE lackeys are running amok.
The Musk-Trump strategy — such as it is — only demonstrates to me that the president has no plan, no principle, no idea of what our so-called leaders want to do.
They have taken a noble cause — making government more efficient — and turned iit nto a clown show.
The product is far from efficient … and no one is laughing.
They have NEVER mentioned cutting social security for those that paid into it!! Quit restating this lie. Each and every time social security is mentioned it’s in regard to the fraud that’s been uncovered and the payments to those that NEVER paid into it.
Musk has stated on X (March 30, 2025) that there are “no cuts to Social Security” unless stopping fraud counts, and in a Yahoo Finance article (April 2, 2025), he expressed optimism about increasing benefits for “legitimate” recipients. He’s tempered some statements with assurances of protecting benefits.