So, a proposal by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to ban ammunition used in assault rifles has become a target by those who say hunters actually use these weapons to hunt wild game.
The weapon at issue is the AR-15, which is virtually identical to the M-16 rifle soldiers have been issued when they go to duty in combat zones.
The ammo in question is a .223-caliber bullet that is tipped with material designed to produce maximum penetration.
ATF wants to ban the ammo. Gun-rights supporters contend it’s another step toward disarming law-abiding Americans. It isn’t. It’s designed to protect law enforcement officers who could be killed by those using these weapons in anger.
Still, some on the right have suggested that the ban would occur by presidential executive action. That’s not the case. This notion is coming from a law enforcement agency.
The Hill reports that lawmakers have asked ATF to pull back the proposal. According to The Hill: “Under no circumstances should ATF adopt a standard that will ban ammunition that is overwhelmingly used by law-abiding Americans for legitimate purposes,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter to ATF Director B. Todd Jones.
The Constitution’s Second Amendment, of course, is the centerpiece of the opposition to the proposal. The Second Amendment does not guarantee the manufacture and distribution of weapons and ammunition that police deem to be dangerous beyond all reason.
There remain plenty of opportunities — even if the ATF ban goes into effect — for law-abiding citizens to “keep and bear arms.”
2 thoughts on “Proposed ammo ban draws fire”
” …against a controversial ammunition ban from the Obama administration.”
“White House press secretary Josh Earnest Monday defended a proposal by the Obama administration to ban ammunition …”
By their own admission this is an executive action undertaken by the White House.
Wow, you delete honest, well-cited corrections absent of any attacks. Second instance. I realize I can be quite nasty, especially when you recklessly sling accusations of racism or homophobia but it’s really a shame to see you have have given up any pretense of honest journalism. Shameless.
Comments are closed.