Itâs time for me to come clean on something that happened this afternoon.
While driving home from a noon meeting in downtown Amarillo, I was flipping through radio channels when I came upon Rush Limbaughâs AM radio gabfest. It didnât take long to remind myself why I virtually never listen to the blowhard. (Note: I said âvirtually never,â because the comments here disqualify me from proclaiming that I âabsolutely neverâ listen to Limbaugh.)
He was bloviating about Secretary of State Hillary Clintonâs appearance before two congressional committees Wednesday in which she explained what happened on Sept. 11, 2012 in that horrific fire fight that erupted at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed four heroic Americans, including Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya. I read Wednesday that he described the hearings as a âpukefest,â apparently out of disgust over the way Democratic senators and House members praised Clintonâs service to the country.
For the record, I concur that sheâs been a spectacular secretary of state.
Limbaugh noted that Clinton has this âaura of invincibilityâ about her, which he apparently doesnât believe is warranted. And why not? âSheâs never been elected to anything,â he bellowed.
Stop. Hold it. Time out.
My memory is clear on this. Hillary Clinton, after serving eight years as first lady of the United States, was elected to the U.S. Senate from New New York in 2000 and re-elected in 2006. Both victories were landslides. Thus, she has been elected to something ⌠a pretty important office in fact. And if I remember it correctly, she won plenty of Senate admirers from both political parties for her work ethic, intelligence and her own ability to forge bipartisan compromises.
Is this a major point? Probably not in the grand scheme of things, but it does demonstrate how one individual continues to hold such sway with an adoring public that ignores his glaring aversion to the truth.
There, now I feel better.