I am OK with changing the name of the Washington Redskins.
Who, after all, ever uses that term other than in a derogatory context? The name ought to change.
Now comes this bit of conjecture: Will the Kansas City Chiefs’ name also come under attack?
I hope not.
Given that I’m not a Native American — even though I was born in the United States to first-generation Americans — perhaps I don’t get what’s so objectionable about the name “Chiefs.”
I’ll concede that the Chiefs long have been one of my favorite pro football teams. I was delighted beyond belief over their dismantling of the Minnesota Vikings in the fourth Super Bowl ever played. But I digress.
To this white man’s way of thinking, “Chiefs” shouldn’t be seen as offensive to Native Americans. By definition, the term identifies the leader of a Native American community. He is the most exalted member of that community and is treated with utmost respect, even reverence.
“Redskins” is another matter altogether. Let’s stop there. Leave the Chiefs’ name alone.