Ladies and gentlemen, I am prepared to declare that we are witnessing with the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on whether Ketanji Brown Jackson should join the Supreme Court a preview of the 2024 Republican Party presidential primary.
Itās an unattractive spectacle and I detest the notion that a respected jurist is being used as a political football by senators who might seek their partyās presidential nomination in 2024.
Iām talking about Ted Cruz of Texas, Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Josh Hawley of Missouri.
They are trying to push hot-button issues dealing with race and abortion and trying to appease the nut-job ābaseā of the GOP voting bloc while they grill Judge Jackson.
To the nomineeās great credit, she is holding up well under the onslaught.
President Biden promised to present a highly qualified nominee to succeed Justice Stephen Breyer. He delivered when he nominated Judge Jackson.
I continue to salute Jacksonās former role as a public defender. The Supreme Court hasnāt yet welcomed a jurist with that kind of background. Jackson has talked about understanding a defendantās mindset and the value that understanding has brought to her experience for the past decade as a judge. That aspect of her background alone would bring remarkable and laudatory diversity to the nationās highest court.
That, of course, wonāt stop the GOP presidential hopefuls from parsing her past comments and seeking to damage her reputation by suggesting things about Judge Jackson that do not exist.
From my vantage point, they are embarrassing themselves and have been unable to lay a hand on the nomineeās stellar standing.