The Ring Magazine has been called the pre-eminent publication about professional boxing.
It made a huge mistake in 1966, though, in failing to name the then-heavyweight champion of the world its Fighter of the Year.
The magazine declined to give the honor to a fellow named Muhammad Ali, who defended his title five times that year, wiping out the competition with ease. Ali was at the peak of his boxing powers.
The magazine, though, disliked his objection to the Vietnam War as well as his affiliation with the Nation of Islam. It refused to call him by the name he chose and used his birth name, Cassius Clay, when referencing The Champ.
Times change — and so do attitudes.
The magazine has decided to grant Ali the title he deserved all along. Fifty years later, Ring has named Ali its Fighter of the Year for 1966, to along with several other such honors the magazine had granted him. It didn’t select a Fighter of the Year in 1966.
It’s a curious thing, though, about the timing of this decision.
Ali won his court fight over his suspension from boxing in 1971, when the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that boxing authorities had violated his constitutional rights by denying him the chance to earn a living. Ring honored him with Fighter of the Year accolades in 1972, 1974, 1975 and 1978. It also honored him in 1963, before he announced his Muslim faith.
Ali died this year at the age of 74.
A more fitting tribute would have been to grant the honor denied to Ali while he was still able to accept and appreciate it.
Those of us — along with hisĀ loved onesĀ — whoĀ marveled atĀ the man’s skill in the ring and his courage outside of it will accept the honor on The Champ’s behalf.