Still, if you’re somebody who only reads the editorial page of The New York Times, try glancing at the page of The Wall Street Journal once in a while. If you’re a fan of Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh, try reading a few columns on the Huffington Post website. It may make your blood boil; your mind may not be changed. But the practice of listening to opposing views is essential for effective citizenship…”-President Obama, U of Michigan, May 1,2010
The above is part of a comment replying to an earlier post I wrote about Rush Limbaugh and his expected criticism of the federal government’s arrest of the suspect in the failed bomb attempt at Times Square.
That the respondent, named “Anonymous,” would send this comment to me implies that I don’t read opinions with which I disagree. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I read them all the time.
I love reading well-written opinions, from thoughtful and responsible people who have something important to say. Whether I agree with their views is irrelevant in that context.
What infuriates me, though, are the audiences who tune in to these talk-show entertainers and then accept what they say as gospel.
And I actually agree with the president’s view that getting one’s blood to boil helps stimulate your thought processes. However, I’ll pass on the blowhards’ overheated rhetoric.
So you're saying that you really don't listen to opposing opinions?
“What infuriates me, though, are the audiences who tune in to these talk-show entertainers and then accept what they say as gospel.”
If you want to see a bunch of mind-numbed robots who blindly parrot the lies of their leaders, wander over to Democrat Underground or Huffington Post. Those are the true homes of the “gospel accepting” audiences.