Category Archives: Uncategorized

State missing road-building opportunity

Perhaps you’ve noticed over a period of time that I like referring to Paul Burka’s blog on Texas Monthly’s website. It provides grist for my own commentary.

His latest item refers to Texas road construction and maintenance.

http://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/road-nowhere

I believe Burka, who’s a smart guy and well-versed in all things relating to Texas government, has glossed over an essential point in extolling the need for the state to pump more money into its highway fund.

It is this: Texas’s economy is built significantly on fossil fuel exploration and development. Therefore, it is in the state’s economic interest — at this time and likely for the foreseeable future — to enable motorists to travel safely on its roads, highways and bridges. Why? Because the vast majority of motor vehicles traveling through the state are powered by gasoline, which comes from those fossil fuels pulled from the ground in Texas.

Burka notes that the state hasn’t raised its gas tax since 1991. He adds correctly that given the mood of the state political leadership, it seems unlikely the Legislature would increase the tax. It’s a matter of politics interfering with good policy.

Do I want to pay more for gasoline when the need arises? No. However, if the revenue were to bolster the state highway fund and create a safer driving environment for my family and me, then I’m all for it.

It’s not that the state is doing nothing. As Burka writes: “The Legislature has proposed a constitutional amendment, to be voted on by the public in November, to provide $1.3 billion for highway projects. Even so, the dollars provided by the amendment will be a drop in the bucket for roadbuilding.”

Texans comprise a mobile society. Those of us who live out here in the vast expanse of West Texas understand that you have to drive some distance to get anywhere.

Road construction and maintenance ought to be a no-brainer for a state as vast as ours — and a state that still relies heavily on fossil fuels to power its economy.

More than a handshake, please, Mr. President

This is making my head hurt, but Texas Gov. Rick Perry is, umm, correct in asking for more than an airport tarmac handshake with Barack Obama when the president arrives in Austin this week.

Perry wants more than handshake with Obama during Texas visit

Perry wants to meet privately with Obama to discuss the border crisis, created by the influx of thousands of illegal immigrants — from Central America — into Texas. The immigrants are young people fleeing repression; they have become commodities of human traffickers and drug lords. It’s a disgraceful development.

I must agree wholeheartedly with the governor on his request for a substantive meeting with the president.

The president reportedly has no plans to visit the border region while he’s in Texas to raise money for Democratic candidates. He should change his mind on that one, too.

As for meeting with Perry, Obama would have to set aside the idiotic statements from the governor, who said over the weekend he believes the White House may have “wanted” the crisis to erupt on the border. To what end is anyone’s guess. Perry hasn’t yet described what possible motive the president and/or the White House would have in fomenting this crisis.

The two men are adults. They’re seasoned pols. They know how to talk “frankly” with each other. I would hope the president could find time to meet with the governor of a significant state that is under siege at the moment by illegal immigrants.

Flames cause setback for Amarillo project

It’s not every day you get to see a significant news event occur while you’re on the job.

So it was today around 6 p.m. when I noticed smoke billowing south of Street Toyota, where I work part time. I craned my neck a little more and then noticed flames belching out from the Town Square Village complex under construction at Hillside Road, just west of Soncy Road.

http://www.newschannel10.com/story/25959864/heavy-smoke-and-flames-from-town-square-village-development

I called 9-1-1, but they told me they were on it. A seemingly countless number of fire trucks began arriving and the flames were extinguished in about 45 minutes.

I’m not aware as I write this if the fire produced any casualties. I pray no one was hurt.

The bigger story, though, will be how much this damage delays the construction project under way. The fire didn’t consume all of it, just part of it. The damage, though, is substantial.

The project is huge and many long-time residents, civic and business leaders see the Town Square Village project as arguably the biggest commercial development to hit Amarillo since Westgate Mall.

It’s going to be huge. It will include retail shopping, residential development, some green space, recreational activities, entertainment … I’m probably missing something, but you get my drift.

The developer, Amarillo resident Perry Williams, is known to have some vision. He helped develop the Tradewinds Airport complex and much of the residential areas around it. He’s done well with his investments and as I’ve told folks all over town for the past year or so, Williams didn’t get to be so rich by being a dummy.

The blaze will set the project back. It should not stop it.

Let’s hope fire investigators learn the cause quickly and that the project can get moving again. Amarillo needs it.

Perry says Obama 'wanted' border crisis to occur

Politics is a cynical business.

It results in politicians saying some pretty outrageous things — often about themselves but usually about their opponents.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has added another chapter to the Book of Cynical Commentary.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2014/07/perry-obama-administration-inept-or-has-ulterior-motive-191578.html?hp=l10

He said over the weekend that President Barack Obama might have wanted the crisis along the Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California borders with Mexico to occur.

“I have to believe when you do not respond in any way, you are either inept or have some ulterior motive that you are functioning from,” the lame-duck Republican governor said on ABC’s “This Week.” Moderator Martha Raddatz had challenged him about earlier comments he made that implied the president might have helped Central American immigrants enter the United States illegally.

I’d go with the competence issue before I’d ever consider some kind of plot to create a crisis where none need exist. This kind of nonsense falls in line with the idiocy spouted recently by former Vice President Dick Cheney that the president is deliberately trying to weaken the United States.

We now have the Texas governor — another loose rhetorical cannon — suggesting the president might have wanted the young people to flood into this country to create a hideous border patrol nightmare. Why? For what purpose does the president of the United States of America deliberately allow such chaos?

I suppose one can chalk it up to another salvo in Perry’s increasingly likely run for the presidency. He’ll leave the Texas governor’s office in January; then he’ll probably start prepping for another run at the GOP nomination for the White House.

Gov. Perry will have to do better than what he demonstrated over the weekend.

To what end, Mr. Speaker?

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner is “frustrated.” He acknowledges that President Obama is frustrated and so are “the American people” frustrated with the lack of cohesion in our federal government.

The speaker’s remedy? He says he wants to sue the president for exercising his executive authority.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/john-boehner-obama-so-sue-me-reaction-constitution-108601.html?hp=f1

I can barely contain my disdain for this nonsense.

Boehner wrote an op-ed for CNN.com in which he said Obama has failed to “faithfully execute” his office under the Constitution. Why didn’t he gripe when President Bush was issuing executive orders at a greater clip than his successor has done?

I have this sense that the president has hurt the speaker’s feelings with his quips from various podiums in recent weeks. “So sue me,” was his latest barb, in which he said he wouldn’t apologize for doing things using his constitutionally granted authority allows him to do.

Boehner says Obama is circumventing the legislative process and is stripping Congress of its own authority.

In a fascinating twist, though, one of the speaker’s own allies — Erick Erickson, of Redstate.com — writes in another commentary that Boehner is engaging in “political theater.”

He has no end game, Erickson writes, adding that there’s nothing to be gained from this wasteful exercise.

“I realize John Boehner and the House Republicans may lack the testicular fortitude to fight President Obama,” he wrote, “but I would kindly ask that he save the taxpayers further money on a political stunt solely designed to incite Republican voters.”

“John Boehner’s lawsuit is nothing more than political theater and a further Republican waste of taxpayer dollars,” Erickson said.

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

Disgraceful exhibit in parade

At this moment, words are failing me.

I just caught up with a story out of Norfolk, Neb., which held a Fourth of July parade to — I reckon — commemorate the founding of this glorious nation of ours.

The parade included a “float” that utterly defies any sense of decency and respect toward the office of the presidency.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/06/obama-outhouse-float_n_5561568.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013

It depicts an outhouse with the words “Obama presidential library.”

In typical cowardly fashion, there was no identification of the sponsor of this exhibit. At this moment, no one seems to know who was responsible for the despicable display.

The presence of this exhibit upset residents who saw it. Some have written to the mayor’s office, to the chamber of commerce. They have called the display racist in nature and have declared themselves ashamed of their town. They are embarrassed that the exhibit would dishonor the office in such a tasteless manner.

I share their disgust.

It’s apparently not the first such exhibit to show up to protest the policies of President Barack Obama. The Huffington Post reported: “The presidential library outhouse comparison has become somewhat of a conservative meme in recent years. A similar structure was on display at Montana’s state Republican convention in 2012. And last fall, an outhouse with a ‘presidential library’ sign drew criticism in a small New Mexico town.”

Then there is this response from someone defending the display. “Rick Konopasek, a member of the Norfolk parade committee, defended the float, comparing it to a political cartoon and noting that multiple parade judges awarded it an ‘honorable mention,'” the Post reported.

I prefer to believe that political cartoons have their place on opinion pages of newspapers or in magazines. A disgraceful exhibit such this has no place on a public street at an event meant to honor the nation’s founding.

I’ll now await the comments from those who consider this to be an appropriate expression of disagreement.

No more inspection sticker? Yes!

Don’t misunderstand me here. I am not that worked up over a change in the way Texas motor vehicles will be marked as being properly inspected.

Beginning next March, the state won’t require motorists to have a sticker slapped on their windshields to show police officers that the vehicle’s been inspected.

The change appears to have some folks a bit nervous. Why? I have no clue.

The idea, as I understand it, is to save the state some dough, a couple million bucks a year. I guess that’s the cost of printing the stickers that go on our windshields.

Some individuals have interpreted the change as meaning the state won’t require the inspections. Wrong.

We’ll still be required to have mechanics look for safety defects in our vehicles before we purchase auto registration stickers that will continue to be displayed on our windshields.

But as with most change, some of us get a bit jumpy about it.

One lawmaker told my pal Enrique Rangel, writing for the Amarillo Globe-News, that he voted against the legislation creating the change because it was “so overreaching.” Rep. Drew Springer, R-Muenster, then told Rangel that the bill was approved with so little debate he’d forgotten about it until Rangel brought it up to him.

I have no idea what he means.

Well, the sticker is gone. The inspection remains. We’ll just have to get used to it, as we usually do whenever change is forced upon us.

McCain sounds too grouchy

Sen. John McCain wears two hats simultaneously.

The veteran Republican lawmaker is known as an occasional partisan crab. He also is a friend of the “liberal media” who happens to work well with Democrats.

This morning, appearing on “Face the Nation,” McCain was asked about a comment by presumed Democratic presidential campaign front runner Hillary Clinton who called McCain her “favorite Republican.”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2014/07/mccain-on-being-clintons-favorite-republican-191582.html?hp=l5

McCain didn’t return the compliment. He said he’d work with a President Clinton if “regrettably” she gets elected. He wouldn’t take the bait offered by “Face the Nation” host Bob Schieffer.

Come on, senator.

Everyone who follows politics knows he worked quite well with then-Sen. Clinton when she served in that body from January 2001 until President Obama selected her to become secretary of state in 2009. Political junkies also are well-versed on McCain’s personal friendship with the current secretary of state, John Kerry, another former Democratic senator with whom McCain served. The two men are combat Navy veterans of the Vietnam War and they share that common bond.

McCain, though, has to play the die-hard Republican card because, as many of his GOP brethren have learned, the tea party wing of the GOP simply won’t stand for Republicans reaching across the aisle to their fellow Americans who happen to be Democrats.

I figure McCain will call Hillary Clinton eventually to tell her — in private, of course — that she is his favorite Democrat.

Go to the border, Mr. President

Buried deep in the story attached to this blog is an item that needs a quick response.

President Obama is coming to Texas this week to raise money for Democratic Party candidates, but he has no plans to visit the border region — the one that’s at the heart of an immigration crisis involving children and young adults.

Bad call, Mr. President. You should go there and see for yourself.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/211384-texas-dem-obama-one-step-behind-on-border-crisis

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said the reason Obama is being invited is to enable local pols to play politics rather than deal with real challenges.

U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Democrat from the border region, says the president has been a “step behind” in responding to the crisis involving a flood of immigrants coming to the United States from Central America. They’re fleeing drug lords, human traffickers and severe poverty.

Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas, has invited the president to see the border for himself. The president is balking. Why? He doesn’t want to politicize this event?

Please. Presidents venture into crisis hot spots all the time. Yes, there’s a political element. There also is a chance for the president to lay eyes on a crisis, which well could energize him to push Homeland Security and Immigration and Naturalization Service staffers to find answers to deal with this flood of immigration.

Is all of this President Obama’s fault? Blame belongs to the nations from which these immigrants are fleeing: Honduras, Guatemala and Nicaragua. I’ll say once again that Mexico, that vast country that sits between Central America and the U.S.’s southern border, also is culpable because it is allowing these young people clear transit through its territory to the United States.

I strongly encourage the president to complete his trip to Texas by visiting the border region. Take a look, Mr. President, and see with your own eyes what’s riled so many of your fellow Americans.

Being out of sorts produces crabbiness

Admit it. When you’re not up to snuff the little things you normally let roll off your back annoy the daylights out of you.

Am I correct? Of course I am.

Allow me, then, this brief rant about how this kind of off-kilter feeling can get in the way of relationships.

I went to work Saturday but didn’t bring my “A game” to the job, which is to greet people courteously at the auto dealership where I spend about 25 hours each week. I did fine with the customers who came through.

My colleagues ticked me off. Repeatedly. They didn’t know it, although I did tell one of them about my sour mood. She understood, having been through them herself from time to time.

I cannot diagnose the cause of my crabbiness. It might been simply being unable to spend more time with our precious granddaughter who came with her parents to see us on a fairly impromptu visit over the Fourth of July weekend.

Then came this moment of pique that on a good day wouldn’t have bothered me in the least. Maybe there’s a cautionary tale here.

One of the sales staffers walked past me and said, “How’s it goin’?” I turned around quickly, but only saw him slip through the door and into the hallway.

What? Why didn’t he wait to hear my answer? Why, I never …

I vented my frustration at that moment to another colleague, who then looked at me as though I’d just grown another head. He didn’t get it. More likely he didn’t care.

Now that I’ve cooled off, I get that he didn’t care. On a better day I wouldn’t have cared much either.

I thought a few moments later about something my congressman, Mac Thornberry, once told me. He said he instructs his young staffers to exercise good manners when dealing with the public. Say “you’re welcome” when someone thanks you, he said, adding that he dislikes people who say “no problem” in response to a simple “thank you.” I agree with that.

He might add this instruction to his staff: When you ask someone “How’s it goin’? or “How you doin’?” stick around long enough to hear the answer.

There. Rant over.