Tag Archives: Nathan Deal

Ga. governor vetoes anti-LGBT law … yes!

religious-exemptions-georgia

Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal has done the right thing by vetoingĀ House Bill 757, which sought to give faith-based business owners the option of denying jobs and services to gays, bisexuals andĀ transgendered individuals.

Those who supported the bill said it protects religious liberty. Those who oppose it said it discriminates needlessly against Americans who shouldn’t be denied their rights as citizens.

There had been reports of pressure being applied by HB 757 foes who said the bill could result in the loss of business and jobs in Georgia.

I’m glad the anti-bill folks won this argument.

Gov. Deal, a Republican, denied he was reacting to pressure from either or both sides of the divide. According to CNN: His decision, he said, was “about the character of our state and the character of our people. Georgia is a welcoming state. It is full of loving, kind and generous people. … I intend to do my part to keep it that way. For that reason I will veto House Bill 757.”

I accept that rationale for doing the right thing by the residents of his state who comprise the whole range of humanity — and all sexual orientations.

One of the more fascinating responses to this doing-business-with-gay-people came not long ago from Ohio Gov. John Kasich, one of three men running for the Republican presidential nomination.

During a debate with the other candidates, the question came to Kasich about legislation allowing business owners to deny serving gay individuals or gay couples. Kasich’s response was about as compassionate as it gets.

He said he believes in “traditional marriage,” but said that those who are in business of serving the public need to understand the differences among all people. Some of those differences involve sexual orientation.

He said that if he were put in that position as a business owner, he would serve a gay individual or a gay couple and then would “pray for them” — privately, seeking his own counsel with God.

I hope that’s part of the complexities of the issue thatĀ has driven Gov. Deal to veto this bill approved by his state’s legislature.

Let’s not seek to interpret what is inĀ one man’sĀ heart and soul.

Whatever the reasons, Deal knows what they are. His veto speaks volumes all by itself.

Georgia prepared for the worst … and got it

Who knew?

Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal got it right this time. He declared a state of emergency ahead of a monster winter storm, as did President Obama.

Lo and behold! Georgians got the message, stayed off the roads and spared themselves a whole lot of the chaos that enveloped the state during the first monster storm that pounded it in January.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/deep-freeze/bone-chilling-winter-blast-wipes-out-power-south-n28156

Deal, a Republican, today thanked his constituents for heeding the call to stay off the roads and highways. For their part, Georgians ought to thank Deal for alerting them in advance of the trouble that was arriving — rather than ignoring the forecasters’ predictions prior to the January storm, which is what Deal did.

His state’s residents paid a huge price for the traffic jams that clogged the state’s interstate highway system in Atlanta. Deal was left with a huge public relations nightmare, as was Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed.

They weren’t about to snooker the public a second time.

It’s good to know that public officials actually can learn from their mistakes.

Governor issues needed storm warning

Give credit where it’s due to Gov. Nathan Deal, R-Ga.

The man can take a hint. After letting the state’s guard down in the face of an earlier snow and ice storm — and getting pounded by critics for the chaos that ensued — the governor has sounded the alarm to be alert to the next historic storm that’s about to pound the Peach State.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/11/us/winter-weather/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

He’s taking no chances this time, nor should he.

Deal is heeding the warnings issued by the National Weather Service, which he inexplicably ignored the first time just a couple of weeks ago.

“It certainly looks like it could be of historic proportions, especially in the last 10 to 20 years,” said National Weather Service forecaster Jason Deese.

To get ready, Deal has mobilized National Guard units and has issued stern warnings to local first responders to be ready for anything.

That’s what governors get paid to do, among other things.

Recall also that Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed took plenty of hits over his city’s shamefully inadequate response to the earlier storm. I’m betting Reed is going to follow the governor’s lead on this storm.

Hope for best, plan for worst

It’s been hysterical the past two days watching Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal and Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed try to explain their way out of an embarrassing lack of preparation for a storm they knew could be coming.

Georgia and much of the Deep South have been clobbered by a rare snow and ice storm. The traffic crisis in Atlanta appeared to especially acute, with cars jamming freeways, trucks jackknifing everywhere, vehicles crashing — and with virtually zero public works crews responding with assistance.

The city and the state were caught flat-footed.

Gov. Deal said local weather forecasters told him the National Weather Service was wrong in its prediction of seriously inclement weather. He went with the locals. Mayor Reed said much the same thing, that the locals knew best about what to expect.

Well, now they’ve been quite chastened by their constituents for failing to heed the warnings from the NWS, which didn’t exactly predict such a storm would occur, but said that it could happen.

Those of us in the Texas Panhandle know how difficult it is to predict the weather, given its volatile nature and its sudden changes in fortune.

Deal today did apologize to Georgia residents for the state’s failure to respond. For that he deserves a pat on the back.

Still, it seems odd that the state’s elected officials — namely the governor and the mayor of Georgia’s largest city and the home of its state government — wouldn’t react to what they were told might occur.

You hope for the best but plan for the worst.