{"id":6181,"date":"2014-07-22T13:20:13","date_gmt":"2014-07-22T13:20:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/highplainsblogger.wordpress.com\/2014\/07\/22\/why-warren-and-not-clinton\/"},"modified":"2014-07-22T13:20:13","modified_gmt":"2014-07-22T13:20:13","slug":"why-warren-and-not-clinton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/?p=6181","title":{"rendered":"Why Warren &#8230; and not Clinton?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=jkanelis\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n<p>Conservatives seem to have hitched themselves to a possible candidacy by a leading U.S. Senate <em>liberal.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has been wowing crowds at political events lately. She&#8217;s been firing up the political base of her Democratic Party. Warren also has gotten the attention of conservative commentators and pundits, such as Byron York, who contends that Warren offers a plan while Hillary Rodham Clinton is running essentially on her resume.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/washingtonexaminer.com\/will-elizabeth-warrens-fight-for-causes-put-hillary-clinton-in-the-shade\/article\/2551098<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll hereby offer my own explanation of why York, a columnist for the Washington Examiner and a Fox News Channel contributor, is so taken by Warren: He wants the Democratic Party to marginalize itself the way Republicans might be willing to do when they nominate their candidate for the 2016 presidential campaign.<\/p>\n<p>You see, Hillary Clinton is a centrist Democrat in the mold of her husband, the 42nd president of the United States. Bill Clinton was the master of &#8220;triangulation,&#8221; and he parlayed his skill at working the extremes against each other so well that he won two smashing election victories in 1992 and 1996.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans don&#8217;t want any more of that.<\/p>\n<p>So some of them have glommed onto Warren&#8217;s candidacy, talking her up.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. Elizabeth Warren is a powerhouse. She&#8217;s smart and courageous. She&#8217;s taking on big-money interests and is talking a darn good populist message about income equality, marriage equality, and financial and tax reform.<\/p>\n<p>York and other conservatives likely don&#8217;t give a damn about the <em>content<\/em> of Warren&#8217;s message. They&#8217;re just thrilled to have someone out there willing to possibly challenge Hillary Clinton&#8217;s perceived inevitability as the Democratic presidential nominee in two years.<\/p>\n<p>She reminds me vaguely of the late Sen. Eugene McCarthy, who in 1968 took on President Lyndon Johnson when it was perceived widely that LBJ would run for re-election. McCarthy stunned the president by nearly beating him in the New Hampshire Democratic primary. On March 31, 1968, LBJ declared he wouldn&#8217;t seek &#8220;another term as your president.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The news thrilled Republicans in &#8217;68. I suspect similar news from Hillary Clinton this time around would have the same effect on the GOP if Warren jumps in and then mounts a serious challenge to Clinton&#8217;s perceived invincibility.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=jkanelis\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conservatives seem to have hitched themselves to a possible candidacy by a leading U.S. Senate liberal. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has been wowing crowds at political events lately. She&#8217;s been firing up the political base of her Democratic Party. Warren also has gotten the attention of conservative commentators and pundits, such as Byron York, who contends &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/?p=6181\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Why Warren &#8230; and not Clinton?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[631,1337,1560,1640,2139,2845,3907,5116],"class_list":["post-6181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bill-clinton","tag-democratic-party","tag-elizabeth-warren","tag-eugene-mccarthy","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-lyndon-johnson","tag-republican-party","tag-vietnam-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}