{"id":21965,"date":"2017-05-28T19:54:05","date_gmt":"2017-05-28T19:54:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/?p=21965"},"modified":"2017-05-28T20:01:27","modified_gmt":"2017-05-28T20:01:27","slug":"more-so-called-judges-deal-blow-to-travel-ban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/?p=21965","title":{"rendered":"More &#8216;so-called judges&#8217; deal blow to travel ban"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=jkanelis\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/images-4_0.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-21192\" src=\"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/images-4_0-300x190.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"190\" srcset=\"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/images-4_0-300x190.jpg 300w, https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/images-4_0-768x487.jpg 768w, https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/images-4_0.jpg 875w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Donald J. Trump stepped into a serious political minefield when he labeled a federal jurist who disagreed with his ban on Muslims entering this country a &#8220;so-called judge.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mr. President, here&#8217;s a flash. More of those &#8220;so-called&#8221; judges have joined in rejecting your revised travel ban.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/regulation\/335359-trump-travel-ban-on-shaky-ground\">http:\/\/thehill.com\/regulation\/335359-trump-travel-ban-on-shaky-ground<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The latest rejection comes from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia. The court ruled that the president&#8217;s second travel ban is as discriminatory against a certain religion as the first ban. The judges scolded him, too, for seeking to pursue a policy they deem to be unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p>It doesn&#8217;t look good for Trump&#8217;s effort to ban entry into this country to those who practice a certain religious faith. The 9th Court of Appeals is set to hear another case that was struck down by a federal judge in Hawaii; the 9th Court had rejected the first ban initially.<\/p>\n<p>The case is likely to end up in the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s lap. Indeed, the nine men and women on the nation&#8217;s highest court well might decide against even hearing the case, which would let the lower-court rulings stand.<\/p>\n<p>We are witnessing from the front row an exercise in the checks-and-balances that the nation&#8217;s founders intended in the 18th century when they drafted the U.S. Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>They did well. Don&#8217;t you think?<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=jkanelis\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Donald J. Trump stepped into a serious political minefield when he labeled a federal jurist who disagreed with his ban on Muslims entering this country a &#8220;so-called judge.&#8221; Mr. President, here&#8217;s a flash. More of those &#8220;so-called&#8221; judges have joined in rejecting your revised travel ban. http:\/\/thehill.com\/regulation\/335359-trump-travel-ban-on-shaky-ground The latest rejection comes from the 4th U.S. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/?p=21965\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">More &#8216;so-called judges&#8217; deal blow to travel ban<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[1424,1708,6895,5053],"class_list":["post-21965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-international-news","tag-donald-trump","tag-federal-judiciary","tag-refugee-ban","tag-us-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21965"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21971,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21965\/revisions\/21971"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highplainsblogger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}