I posted an item on High Plains Blogger that sought to explain that the U.S. Constitution need not state matters in black and white for issues to remain relevant.
My particular target dealt with a statement in a column published in the Amarillo Globe-News that the words “separation of church and state” are not in the Constitution, as if to suggest that there really is no “separation.” Well, there is.
Here is what I wrote:
I want to reiterate a point I’ve made a time or three already.
It is that the founding fathers did not create a perfect governing document, but on the issue of church/state separation, they got that part perfectly.
They didn’t liberate the slaves when they drafted the Constitution. They didn’t give women the right to vote.
However, on the issue of whether to establish a secular state, they hit it out of the park. They sought to form a government that did not dictate how people should worship. They gave us the right to worship as we please, or not worship at all.
The First Amendment contains four elements: a free press, the freedom of speech, the ability to seek redress of grievances against the government and of religion.
Of those four elements, the founders listed the religion part first.
Does that suggest to you that the founders’ stipulation in the First Amendment that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof … ” was the most important civil liberty they wanted to protect?
That’s how I interpret it.
The founders’ direct ancestors fled religious persecution in Europe and they damn sure insisted that it must not happen in the United States of America.